toby1kenobi
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Yoast SEO] Incorrect image path in yoast-schema-graph thumbnailUrlThank you – I have done all of that, it hasn’t changed that URL unfortunately.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Yoast SEO] Incorrect image path in yoast-schema-graph thumbnailUrlThanks for your reply.
The page doesn’t have a featured image though (and shouldn’t have one)? If we add one it will display on the page, which we don’t want (and the image that’s being used in thumbnailUrl was never the featured image).
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Image resolution settings no longer workI have this issue too – insert image, select ‘Medium’ resolution, WordPress ignores this and outputs the full size image in the src attribute, with the medium-sized version referenced as one of the options in the srcset. I just want the medium one to display – really frustrating.
That’s great, thank you so much!
Toby
Ok thanks for the offer, don’t worry though (that’s something I can do, I just wondered if there was anything I could hook into in the plugin).
Sure, we need to add a data attribute to this button on a site where Google tag Manager will be looking for it (the data attribute). Presumably somewhat similar to the data-cli_action attribute you’re using.
Hope this helps.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Advanced Custom Fields (ACF?)] Custom field for specific page template?Thank you! I’m using ACF 5.9.4 and WordPress 4.9.16
Your reply is really helpful, thanks for this!
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Image editor not workingSorry, been away over the Christmas break.
I had not seen that plugin, thanks for that – I see that Imagick wasn’t installed, and installing that seems to have fixed the issue.
Thanks very much for your help!
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Image editor not workingThey are
Great, thank you.
Ah, maybe it’s fine – the Diagnostics tab seems to think everything’s ok now, but there’s a nagging panel everywhere in the WordPress back end saying, “Your ‘How does Wordfence get IPs’ setting is misconfigured. This site is currently using the X-Forwarded-For…”
Is that actually misleading, should I just dismiss it?
Thanks for getting back to me.
I guess that could be something to do with it – Varnish listens on port 80, Apache on port 443 (and WordPress admin, where I see the message from Wordfence runs over SSL). Apache wasn’t passing a value for X-Forwarded-For value, however I have updated the SSL config to do this, I’ve added this:
RewriteEngine On RewriteRule . - [E=noxff:%{REMOTE_ADDR}] RequestHeader setIfEmpty X-Forwarded-For "%{noxff}e"
This seems to be outputting X-Forwarded-For values in Apache’s log files at least, Wordfence is still giving me that message though. Weirdly, on its Options page it says
Detected IP(s): [my IP address] Your IP with this setting: [my IP address]
and shows the correct information.
I looked on another site we manage, hopefully you can see this https://ibb.co/gmw6Fo
Apologies, thought I’d replied to this already – it doesn’t seem to be happening right now, I will try to keep an eye on it and see if it recurs.
What is the timescale for the table of most blocked IPs that appears in WordPress’s dashboard, maybe those hits I’m seeing are really old?
Thanks.