stevarino

Oh, and as a side note, I believe using <cite> is the preferred way here, not .
Visually it applies italics to text so it looks the exact same as <i> and , but semantically it infers referencing.

No, its an html problem. You have a div in your head (never thought I’d say that). I don’t know why it’s just appearing in your archive pages and not your home pages, but that appears to be a large problem (although not necessarily THE problem).
When things look odd, you should probably try validating your webpages.
– Stephen

Try changing this:
<script language="JavaScript" src="wordpress/readmore.js" type="text/JavaScript" />
to this:
<script language="JavaScript" src="wordpress/readmore.js" type="text/JavaScript"></script>
That appears to be the problem…
– Stephen

I might have something like that in about a few days (maybe tomorrow). ?? Couldn’t find any available hacks that did it for me, so I’m working on one now. It’s a bit complicated though, taking the Content Management away from the CMS…

actually disregard that. it won’t hurt anything, but it doesn’t solve the problem…. What is going on here?

it works in mozilla. ??
But firing up IE shows that you’re right, it doesn’t work. It shouldn’t be that hard, an old project of mine was just that.
You need to change the “wp-admin/quicktags.js” file (you can do that from the template screen by typing that into the edit box). Look for this block (a notepad find might help):
<pre>if (sel.text.length > 0) {
sel.text = edButtons[i].tagStart + sel.text + edButtons[i].tagEnd;
}</pre>
Change that to:
<pre>if (sel.text.length > 0) {
tag = edButtons[i].tagStart + sel.text + edButtons[i].tagEnd;
sel.text = tag;
sel.moveStart(‘character’, -tag.length);
sel.select();
}</pre>
and that did the trick for me! Honestly IE has horrible support for this type of code, so be understanding! ??

WillM, agreed. One thing I desperately want from IE-PNG support is true anti-aliased text in images. It’s one thing for microsoft to ignore the png standards, but making up their own to replace what should work? It just doesn’t make sense…
</chewbacca defense>

Courtesy of our counterparts at webmasterworld, here’s the code for it to work:
Explorer:
filter: alpha(opacity=50);
Mozilla (not Netscape?!?):
-moz-opacity: .5;
Safari:
-khtml-opacity: .5;
Nothing on opera, though. Anybody care to check (can’t install it on this box).

Ahh, here we go: https://www.quirksmode.org/css/opacity.html
A guide to just what you wanted, including safari! I believe that would be a good amount of browser-market space. ??

While these tricks are definately cool, they are non-standard attributes to css. This means that they will probably never be fully supported by everyone for one reason or another. No clue if the w3c is even considering anything like this…
However, I do remember some specific filters developed for IE 4 that work. Combine that with the mozilla-specific code, and that takes care of modern IE and Gecko-based browsers. A decent start.

Do a search for css-image-replacement or more specificly Fahrner Image Replacement and that should give you your answer. But if you want answers now, you could try here, the post that brought image-replacement to the mainstream.

oops, mixed up the less-than and greater than. d’oh!
javascript:opener.parent.location=’b.htm’; window.close();“>click to change parent
Everyone messes up eventually… ??

>a href=”javascript:opener.parent.location=’b.htm’; window.close();”<click to change parent>/a<

Check out here:
https://dinki.mine.nu/wordpress_count.php

Ouch, it’s worse than I thought! Not even Gecko browsers support this, only Opera from 4.0 on it seems.
https://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/css/supportkey/generate.htm
Eh, it was worth a try…