silencerocks

Dear Ben,

I have the results now. Instead of changing the buffer size for the actual database, the support told me to switch to a newer server, that they planned to do soon anyway. After the switch now the URL-filtered results show instantly, regardless of the date range. So:

Date range: 1 day -> Stats showing after: <1s
Date range: 7 days -> Stats showing after: <1s
Date range: 14 days -> Stats showing: 1s
Date range: 30 days -> Stats showing: 1s
Date range: 90 days -> Stats showing: 1s

On the new server I get this value:

innodb_buffer_pool_size: 1073741824

(was 268435456 on the old one)

so I think, your solution was right

I could not be happier ?? Left you a review. Keep up the great work!

Thank you a lot for your effort.

SHOW VARIABLES LIKE '%innodb_buffer_pool_size%';

resulted in:

innodb_buffer_pool_size: 268435456

which would be 0,26 GB. I don’t have the privileges to set

SET GLOBAL innodb_buffer_pool_size=1048576000;

myself, so I requested it from my hoster. They’re only going to do it on monday, so I wait for that and will tell you about the result.

In the meantime – have a nice week ??

Hi! Thank you for your quick answer. I also upgradeded WP and PHP.

After PHP Upgrade 7.6->8.2 and WordPress 6.4->6.5.3

Date range: 1 day -> Stats showing after: 1s
Date range: 7 days -> Stats showing after: 5s
Date range: 30 days -> Stats showing: Never

That didn’t solve the problem.

So I tried the SQL-Command

Date range: 1 day -> Stats showing after: 1s
Date range: 7 days -> Stats showing after: 1s
Date range: 14 days -> Stats showing: 229s
Date range: 30 days -> Stats showing: Never

All the Spikes happend, when I tried to get data from IA. The one on the left was even 2.5 hours long – still just a 30-day-request.

Strangely in rare cases the 30days graph and data show up. But I could not figure out, why or when that happens. In that case, the graph with data show within a few seconds.

Since you mentioned that the problem might have to do with memory, could my actual php_memory_limit = 128M be the problem? Or my server resources/hosting plan (1core, 2GB RAM)?

• This reply was modified 10 months, 2 weeks ago by silencerocks.

Hello Ben,

unfortunately the error persists for approximately 98% of the time.

• The Stats show perfectly if I use the predefined Sections like “Top Landing Pages”, “Fastest Growing Pages” etc. and also longer date ranges like 30 or 90 days.
• It also works, when I use an URL-Filter with just a single day.
• It’s not working anymore as the date range is a week or more.

The error log shows:

2024/05/08 12:26:45 [error] 3904297#3904297: *109825 upstream timed out (110: Connection timed out) while reading response header from upstream, client: 212.56.161.32, server: dr-armin-kaser.com, request: “POST /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php HTTP/2.0”, upstream: “fastcgi://unix:/var/run/wordpress.php-fpm.sock”, host: “dr-armin-kaser.com”, referrer: “https://dr-armin-kaser.com/wp-admin/admin.php?page=independent-analytics&#8221;

Just after trying to get the data, server logs show a spike in CPU-Load.

Since this might be a performance issue/time out-issue i measured the time until the stats show.

With a URL-Filter applied:

Date range: 1 day -> Stats showing after: 1s
Date range: 7 days -> Stats showing after: 15s
Date range: 30 days -> Stats showing: Never (but would be after 64s, calculated from the obove)

I’d happily give you access to my site’s backend, no problem.
The site is dr-armin-kaser.com

• This reply was modified 10 months, 2 weeks ago by silencerocks.

Thank you!

Excellent, i will let you know if it persists after the next update ??

hi,

since the threadstarter did not answer anymore, i’d like to report what seems to be the same problem to me.

For me the pictures are always shown on the front end, but are not shown in the backend where i edit the sites.

Pictures come back if i disable LazyLoad by WPRocket OR if i disable Themify.
I still think the problem is with themify because the Inspector shows this error:

page-options.min.js?ver=STAGING-5.9:2 Uncaught ReferenceError: Themify is not defined
at page-options.min.js?ver=STAGING-5.9:2:75

Got the same error, but I could fix it by clearing the hoster’s cache. May be the solution for somebody else too, ??

Hello Adame,

great support, thanks a lot!

Both methods work. What’s a bit disapointing is, that caching the thumbnails locally doesn’t improve loading speed. If I put the video above the fold it becomes the Largest Contentful Paint and takes 3,4 Seconds to load – opposed to 1,5 average on my website.

I might have been wrong, thinking, it’s just an image – from what I understood now in the sourcecode there’s a javascript that needs to be executed first.

Anyway I don’t want to stress that topic too much. This plugin remains the best choice and makes my website blazing fast ??

Dear support,
thank you for trying this solution.

Nevertheless I still think Quiz and Survey Master is the best plugin for this purpose available and I’ll stick to it anyways.

Hopefully Google changes the way it measures qls in the future since displaying the results at the place of the questions is clearly the best solution for the user

Thank you!

Please check that the rating is good when filling up the quiz.

It will only be poor after submitting quiz and this is inevitable, as QSM needs to clear the quiz and fill the results response from the server.

According to

https://web.dev/optimize-cls/

CLS “measures the instability of content by summing shift scores across layout shifts that don’t occur within 500ms of user input”

Maybe the slow scroll to the top of quiz-box after hitting the submit-button is the problem? I don’t know how to test that on my own, but if instead of scrolling a quick jump to the top of the quiz-box would not count as shift, since it’s directly after the user input?

Dear Support,

thank you a lot for installing the plugin and trying out yourself. I tried to replicate your score below 0.1 but i was unable.

I think the most reliable thing is to check the PageSpeed Insights of your sample page. That should bring out the same result for every user:

https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?hl=de&url=https%3A%2F%2Fquizandsurveymaster.com%2Fquiz%2Fsample-quiz-5%2F&tab=mobile

https://snipboard.io/0xoWSV.jpg

As you can see, just loading the page (by google on a mobile moto g4 – which is google’s default phone) results in a cls (labdata) of cls= 0,35. When you scroll down to the screenshots it seems that the size of the logo is not fixed, so theres a shift to the top as soon as the logo loads (smaller than expected).

Your whole domain is rated as Core Web vitals “failed” – that is the origin summary collected by real users in chrome. The Cumulative Layout Shift for all pages combined is cls=0,21 for the whole quizandsurveymaster.com.

From the screenshot you deliverd it seems you’re using a desktop environment. When i try to replicate that i get a cls=0.658.

https://snipboard.io/eIxjoS.jpg

What actually counts for google is a mobile environment with Moto G4. You can use this setting in the Chrome Developement Mode (Ctrl+Shift+I), click on the “Toggle Device” and use the Moto G4-Preset.

Reloading the Page results in cls=0,391

https://snipboard.io/Cy3UIW.jpg

After filling out the quiz still cls=0,391

https://snipboard.io/70inru.jpg

Hitting the submit button raises to cls=0,910

https://snipboard.io/ykwCYo.jpg

I hope that helps. The actual score you get with the plugin depends on your settings and environment but at least the PageSpeed Insights should be the same.

Thanks!

Also die Screenshots funktionieren bei mir.

Auch das Padding mit 0px funktioniert bei meiner Website einwandfrei – da gibt es keinen Abstand zwischen Boxrand und Text. Wenn Du den Link Deiner Website posten m?chtest, kann man vielleicht im Inspector von Chrome sehen, woran es liegt. Ansonsten wei? ich per Ferndiagnose leider nicht mehr weiter.

lg

Also wenn ich alle paddings auf 0 setze, hab ich keine Abst?nde zum Rand mehr.

	padding-left:0px;
	padding-right:0px;
	padding-top:0px;
	padding-bottom:0px;

Smartphone Vorschau
Desktop Vorschau

Vielleicht postest Du kurz den Link zur Website (falls online).

• This reply was modified 4 years, 7 months ago by silencerocks.