Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Sahaskatta, these assumptions are all wrong, it’s an acknowledged hack of servers that were not in the possession or control of the people or entities you list above. The owners of the domains are definitely not complicit, nor was it likely that the originating poster was.

    The Phoenix Exploit in kit has been implicated in issues in the realm of these posts.

    See https://community.websense.com/blogs/securitylabs/archive/2010/08/05/Media-Temple-injections-lead-to-Phoenix-Exploit-Kit.aspx

    and https://blogs.computerworld.com/16904/mass_injections_and_malware_continue_at_media_temple

    It’s not a good idea or fair to place in a blog post, the data above, when you’re not certain about the facts, as erroneous information defames the parties.

    As much as you want to “have that company stopped”, the ones you unwittingly think are behind this, they probably want to stop you or Skattertech from spreading false impressions.

    Someone attempted to maliciously point those domains to a hacked server, but the domains and contacts you list were surely not complicit. This could even be a registrar breach.

    The domains above don’t show any involvement with this attack and are clean.

    Sahaskatta and zackisaiah – to be fair and more important, to be accurate, you should remove these errant publications of opinions/assumptions about the domains and registrants.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)