Pelly Benassi

@kevinthom thanks for that, though what you get now was always the case for me, it throws the error but the page/post is actually deleted.

Anyway I’ve moved to another hosting and I’m not using OPCache anymore, so the problem is gone for me, though it’d be nice if the dev barged in ??

Take care!

Oh wow I hadn’t noticed, thanks a lot! You’re right, it might be due to the query parameters which might be hard to cache because they change the filters on the page.

I’ll look into that!

You have a nice day too thanks ??

@kevinthom damn you’re right!

Congrats! That’s some great stats!

Thanks!! It’s also in part thanks to your plugin and your tips from this post ??

?I still have some hard time to imagine paying the price of a full dedicated server for only a fraction of its specs (RAM/CPU/Storage). But it is the price of tranquility.

I agree, but for ~ €50 per month I can’t really complain, and since I’m a solo developer handling both code and hosting, I’m happy to pay a little bit extra for that peace of mind and their excellent support. I really can’t afford the company’s website to go down!

Regarding their stack, NGINX / Varnish / WP Rocket is indeed very strong and proof-tested. Like I said in my previous post, LiteSpeed becomes really relevant for?dynamic?websites, with e-commerce for example. Since there is no Private Cache in WP Rocket, logged users would always perform PHP requests there.

True that, but the only users who log in to our website are editors/admins so I’m fine with that ??

?There are some page that still have a BYPASS flag, so I guess you’re currently tweaking it.

Uhm, I haven’t tweaked much yet actually, I’ve just enabled it through their WP plugin and that’s about it, I still didn’t get a chance to dig deeper into the dashboard, but that’s interesting because I haven’t bypassed any pages :/
I am bypassing some via WP Rocket, but that should not affect APO’s rules…

I’ll look into that thank you mate! ??

Well looks like I found a fellow performance enthusiast ??

Thank you so much, this post was incredibly insightful and a pleasure to read!

I’ve recently moved the website on Cloudways (it’s amazing btw), and I don’t think using LiteSpeed is an option there, but they do use their combination of Apache + NGINX + Varnish which is incredibly fast, and I’m getting pretty awesome performance (due also to lots of optimization on my end to be fair haha)

And with a load of 250 concurrent users, the server response time is ~28ms

So in general I’m pretty happy right now and I don’t think it’s worth diving into LiteSpeed for now ??

But I’ll definitely look into APO and Argo as they seem extremely interesting!

Once again thanks a lot for your replies and for this fantastic plugin, wish you a wonderful day ahead!

I’m amazed at the thoroughness of your reply, thank you so much! I’m so proud to be a Pro subscriber ??

This really answered all the questions I had in my mind, it was extremely helpful. I’m totally fine with a few KB or RAM being used instead of hammering the DB with unnecessary calls ??

As for the cache, we already have several cache layers in place:

• Cloudflare (Enterprise)
• WP Rocket
• Object Cache
• Varnish
• Redis

Would there be any reason to use LiteSpeed too on top of these, or would they overlap each other somehow?

Hi Mikko sorry for the late reply!
I’m sorry if my comparison to Google came across as disrespectful but I hope you understand it was just an example, and you’re right in saying that it’s not a fair comparison. You’re doing a fantastic job with Relevanssi, especially for one guy only!

I’ll play around with your solution, and I’m looking forward to that hook.

Thank you so much, I’ll go ahead and ask the company to pay for premium as good work shouldn’t go unpaid.

Take care ??

Yeah, I can use quotes, but honestly who knows about that besides geeks and developers? ??
Like if you search for Call of Duty on Google, it only highlights the whole sentence in the results, and you certainly don’t need to add quotes for that.

True a filter like that might work, but like you said it might be too aggressive for other searches :/

I guess a cool option would be to have individual CSS classes for partials and full sentences, so that if 's' => 'Call of Duty' , then ‘Call of Duty’ gets a CSS class and the individual words get another one. That would at least give the dev an option to not highlight partials.

I don’t know I’m probably not thinking this through and talking out of my bum haha.

Either way thanks for your prompt reply and again for this beautiful plugin!

@pderksen thanks for your prompt reply, however I’m afraid this is not helping solving the problem. I would need to grab the values from custom fields created with ACF. We have several pages using the same page template, but for every page the value of the custom fields changes and we create new ones on a daily basis.
By following the way the plugin is structured now, the site manager would have to create a new form for every page, and add the shortcode to the page’s content. It’s a cumbersome and messy process compared to the current one. This would mean a huge refactoring of our code and it’s quite inconvenient that the [stripe] shortcode has been removed ??
Guess we’ll stick to the older version.

Thanks!

Hi Phil, thanks for your amazing plugin ?? Glad I found this post as I’ve been having the same issue. For now I’ve rolled back so it’s all fine, but I’d like to keep all our plugins up to date for security reasons and peace of mind.

I would really need to keep using the [stripe] shortcode as I’m generating it dynamically based on the pages’ custom fields content:

do_shortcode('[stripe name="'. $stripe_name . '" description="'. $stripe_description . '" amount="'. $stripe_amount . '" id="stripe-button"]')

I wouldn’t know how to go about this if I use the visual editor… Any ideas please?

Thanks a lot ??
Alessandro

I had no plugins enabled (except CF7 of course) and running _s theme.

Hi @vasyltech thanks a lot for the quick reply! I’ll definitely give that extension a try whenever I get a moment.

Thank you!

well you are the author, of course……

Same here. Would be nice if the dev could give some advice or at least a sign of being aware of the issue?

Thanks

very glad I could be of help! ??