Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Thread Starter oldfish

    (@oldfish)

    thanks guys that answers it for me. i know the redundant bits equate to a fraction of a fraction of a second, but somehow i feel better being rid of them.

    i figured they could go, but had that nagging “what if” thought.

    zeniph- i have done a few searches and looked at several templates. you’re right, there’s a lot out there.

    Thread Starter oldfish

    (@oldfish)

    well it’s the default theme, so i figured you all had a copy.

    I guess I will clarify the above example. There are several sections to the style.css file. There is a typography section for all the lovely text and background formatting. There is also a structure section that deals with the padding, margins, position, etc.

    in typography we have this:
    #page {
    background-color: white;
    border: 1px solid #959596;

    text-align: left;
    }

    in structure we have this:
    #page {
    background-color: white;
    margin: 20px auto;
    padding: 0;
    width: 760px;
    border: 1px solid #959596;
    }

    As you can see there is a bit of repetition with the CSS. That’s just one example among many. Is there a reason that would be there other than to create a nightmare for updating the CSS?

    I can strip it all out no problem, but if someone has a cleaner version it would make things a bit easier as the file is nearly 700 lines long, and tracking down redundancies kind of sucks.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)