Nazgul
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: no-www, revamped, rewrittenThat should indeed fix the bug I mentioned.
Will you be implementing my feature request?
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Validating XHTML helpYou went down from 9 to 4 errors’ so it’s a start.
Next: Add a
<title>Some Text Here</title>
section within your<head>...</head>
section.And add a
</ul>
above this line in your sidebar
<div id="text-3" class="widget widget_text"> <h2 class="widgettitle">Page Rank</h2>
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Maximum time execution and cache.phpIncrease the max_execution_time setting in the php.ini file.
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Validating XHTML helpYou have a
</head>
in your footer. Change that to</body>
.In your header, just above the line
<div id="page">
add the following:
</head>
<body>Start with this and see where it gets you.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: no-www, revamped, rewrittenSounds nice.
But I would like to have the www to non-www version. ??
Also, it currently breaks if you have a domain name containing www, not just starting with it.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: New Plugin: A9 SiteInfo GeneratorI just installed it and I like it. I’ve even made a Dutch .mo and .po file for it. Maybe you can include them in the official distribution?
Few remarks:
-The generation date on the option page doesn’t use the WordPress configured date format, so I see it in an English format (21 June 2006) instead of the expected Dutch (21 Juni 2006).
– The translated ‘Search for’ language item isn’t honored in the generated XML. I still see the English text.Forum: Everything else WordPress
In reply to: Brinkster updated their mysql server and I have an error.Binaryone: The risk of being hacked depends on the PHP software that’s running on those machines. Because Brinkster just hosts sites, they don’t know what you (=the customers) put on there. If everyone is using software thats written correctly, than the chance of being hacked are slim, but on the other hand, if somebody forgets to patch or update some buggy script then the server is highly at risk. And as I’ve said, Brinkster can’t determine that.
And I know from experience, from working at a large IT company, that there’s no such thing as upgrade to the latest version of a product immediately. Because a lot of things can go wrong during an upgrade, which don’t even have to be Brinksters fault, but they will be the ones ‘getting screamed at’ because of it. So I understand that they want to do a test upgrade before doing it system-wide. I also understand that they implement the NO_BACKSLASH_ESCAPES workaround while testing the upgrade.
What I do not understand is that they don’t/didn’t communicate the issue, so people would know why their system wasn’t working as expected, and that there was a valid (and temporary) reason for it.
The other thing I don’t understand is that it has already taken them 3 weeks to even start upgrading. I’ve stated before that they should have some time to test and plan the upgrade, maybe a week, but definitely not 3 weeks.
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Making WordPress run fasterI’d upgrade to 2.0.3 if I were you. Next to a fixed security issue it also has some speed improvements as maerk mentioned.
Look here for a short list of the changes.
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Deleted Some Folders Accidently – How to Re-InstallAlthough its wise to backup your wp-config.php file and possible plugins/themes you installed.
Forum: Themes and Templates
In reply to: Blix Theme Display Calendar & Recent PostsThesraid, you can post code here by putting it between backticks. (Look like apostophs and are next to the 1 key on most keyboards)
Yes, I think it’s a problem with the div’s somewhere. I’ve been doing some experimenting on this side to see if I can find which one, but so far no luck.
Header looks ok. Index contained a bogus
</div>
and a ; was missing. I also made a small error in the footer.php above, so I’ve updated that post. So if you could also replace that one again?<?php get_header(); ?>
<div id="content">
<?php if (have_posts()) :?>
<?php $postCount=0; ?>
<?php while (have_posts()) : the_post();?>
<?php $postCount++;?>
<div class="entry" <?php echo $postCount ;?>">
<div class="entrytitle">
<h2><a href="<?php the_permalink() ?>" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link to <?php the_title(); ?>"><?php the_title(); ?></a></h2>
</div>
<div class="entrybody">
<?php the_content('Read the rest of this entry »'); ?>
</div><div class="commentsblock">
<?php comments_template(); ?>
</div>
<?php endwhile; ?>
<div class="navigation">
<div class="alignleft"><?php next_posts_link('« Previous Entries') ?></div>
<div class="alignright"><?php previous_posts_link('Next Entries »') ?></div>
</div><?php else : ?>
<h2>Not Found</h2>
<div class="entrybody">Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.</div><?php endif; ?>
</div>
<?php get_sidebar(); ?>
<?php get_footer(); ?>We’re getting there. We’re down to just 2 validation errors, which I think are in either header.php or index.php, so if you could post those ones as well, again between backticks.
Replace it with (you were missing a
>
):</div>
<div id="footer">
© James Doman - <a href="https://www.jdoman.com/blog/about/site">About the site</a>.
</div>
</body>
</html>But it solved most of your validation errors, so we’ll try to fix the others as well and see if that helps.
Could you also post your footer.php between backticks?