jensenworks

Thank you for sharing that rickannino – I have just tried your solution, but for me, unfortunately, although the issues were partially resolved by way of a second plugin update since the one that caused things to stop functioning, I am still seeing errors and am still experiencing lost functionality.

Kudos to the developer though, as he has been forthcoming with email.

At the risk of being told to start my own thread, I just want to second this and say that I too am having this same experience with the plugin and hoping for a timely resolution.

It seems that there is one thing it is trying to access without success: wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=wordfence_logHuman&hid=(x) which is a component of the Wordfence plugin. Disabling Live Traffic within the Wordfence options has cleared the error for me and is recommended, particularly for websites hosted on shared server environments due to the additional load it creates.

So to try this yourself, log in to your WP admin, go to Wordfence > Options, uncheck Enable Live Traffic View [] This option enables live traffic logging.

There may be other issues beyond this, but having gone through the same process as everyone above, this seems to be the most likely culprit for a lot of people. Hope it helps.

Ok, probably good to know for anyone who has upgraded their WordPress installation in the last 18 months that for some reason due to the version compatibility, anyone who has upgraded will be allowing the version that allows an unexpected redirect to a questionable third party website.

That clarifies things for me. Thank you!

I have a feeling that timing is everything. It seems to be completely resolved for me now as well. The theme I am running did just get updated today though, so perhaps it was something to do with that. I do apologize for sending you on a bit of a wild goose chase there but after disabling all plugins and re-enabling them one at a time and ultimately re-enabling them all, I wonder if I should have checked just once more before disabling them all, as I had updated the theme this morning. Alas, I didn’t. But all is well and thank you for your effort. It is sincerely appreciated.

It’s not actually Jetpack, it’s Jetpack Only for Admins. There is a flaw present in the Jetpack plugin that allows all users access to it, not just admins, so the Jetpack Only for Admins plugin prevents non-admins from being able to see it.

Browser version is Internet Explorer 10 (10.0.9200.16660).

I’m not sure if in this case it would be better for the developer of Jetpack Only for Admins to fix the problem that their plugin causes or for you to accommodate their plugin, but I would personally think the former. Just my 2 cents.

Thank you for the response though!

Obviously it would be better if this was supported natively by the theme, but for anyone else who just can’t wait and understands the nature of updating a parent them vs. a child theme, the following will allow you to have the instagram icon display, with the customization able to be maintained via the Dashboard interface:

NOTE: These changes WILL be lost if the theme is updated and you do these updates to the parent theme.

1) Add the following to around line #7075 in the /inc/css/(color).css file:
.icon-instagram:before {
content: “\f215”;
}

2) Add the following to around line #704 in the /inc/admin/class-admin-customize.php file:
‘tc_theme_options[tc_instagram]’ => array(
‘sanitize_callback’ => array( $this , ‘tc_sanitize_url’ ),
‘control’ => ‘TC_controls’ ,
‘label’ => __( ‘Instagram profile url’ , ‘customizr’ ),
‘section’ => ‘tc_social_settings’ ,
‘type’ => ‘url’ ,
‘priority’ => 125
),

3) Add the following to around line #301 in the /inc/class-fire-utils.php file:
‘tc_instagram’ => ‘instagram’,

Hope this helps anyone else in the same boat.

Ok, well whatever becomes available, we would love to test it out when it does. In the meantime, we will just duplicate the listings in a hard-coded page, no worries.

We do sincerely appreciate your prompt reply and keeping in touch.

Thank you.

Hi …

Actually, all on one page would be perfect, no pagination is required for what we’re looking for. Hoping that means it might be a little easier to implement? ??

Thank you.

Matthew