Tunn

Hi, Guido!

I am not a coder, but I like to learn, so I already customized a part of your plugin (vscf-form.php) to accomplish my needs. I like your plugin, but I don’t want to be a maintainer of it :), so I can send the customized file to you, just send me your email through this link: infopsi.md/contact. The page is in Romanian, but you will understand what to do :).

P.S. As I said, I am not a coder, so I would appreciate if you could improve my customizations.

Regards,
Iurie

Sorry, I found it: error_captcha="Your text here".

OK, thank you! I will try the Yoast SEO plugin.

@jollychap, I suppose, the scenario to use both Media Cleaner and Advanced Database Cleanup must be this:

1. Search with Media Cleaner to find potential trash.
2. Check what was found by Media Cleaner and, if all is OK, empty the trash bin, also with Media Cleaner. As was mentioned by @tigroumeow the Advanced Database Cleanup cannot remove the actual files from the trash system, it only cleans the database (so, it will delete only entries about your trash from database, not files).
3. Run Advanced Database Cleanup.

P.S. This will be also a manual for my own use of these plugins ??

• This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by Tunn.

I know how to modify the event details in backend of event management. And I see there that both events have a web site link for the event organizer, but in frontend this link is displayed only for the first event, not for the second. The only differences that I see between original events is that the first event has two organizers (so, two web URLs, but only the first is retrieved and displayed) and a supplementary URL for Ticket Information, that also is displayed after importing, but not seen in the backend form (Event Details). Probably, the importing process is somehow affected by these particularities and they are retained and displayed differently.

P.S. I want to reinstall my WP, so you can test only with original Facebook events in discussion:

Facebook events in discussion: first and second.

• This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by Tunn.

Featured image imported with an event is OK. It is there, it is visible and it is associated with the imported new post. But, when I check the link of that new imported post with the Facebook Open Graph Object Debugger I see a list of Warnings That Should Be Fixed:

Inferred Property The ‘og:url’ property should be explicitly provided, even if a value can be inferred from other tags.
Inferred Property The ‘og:title’ property should be explicitly provided, even if a value can be inferred from other tags.
Inferred Property The ‘og:description’ property should be explicitly provided, even if a value can be inferred from other tags.
Inferred Property The ‘og:image’ property should be explicitly provided, even if a value can be inferred from other tags.
Share App ID Missing The ‘fb:app_id’ property should be explicitly provided, Specify the app ID so that stories shared to Facebook will be properly attributed to the app. Alternatively, app_id can be set in url when open the share dialog.

So, if I understand correctly, this can be because of a) your plugin, b) my theme, or c) this is the actual WP behavior.

Probably, related only to the imported events, your plugin must check if the Open Graph properties are OK, if not, they must be added/corrected.

@liedekef,
I have this message both in Firefox and Chrome. I used the same Facebook App ID and App Secret with the Import Facebook Events plugin and it just works, not yours plugin. I do not criticize, I just want to use your plugin and I need a solution. I tried to logout/login both in WordPress and Facebook, but this doesn’t helped.

UPDATE

Sorry, this is my fault! I didn’t added the Site URL of my web page to the application. This is solved.

• This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by Tunn.

You are welcome, @bryanhiggs!

I suppose, the plugin author deserves some extra stars.

P.S. I am not affiliated with him in any way. ??

@bryanhiggs, good news!

Sorry, I did not notice this option.

Thank you very much!

“you need to enable “logged-in user” option.”

Why that option is not enabled/forced by default? This will prevent such reviews.

@lanesharon Can you share more details?

I would opt for an form option so the ad author can decide whether or not to allow the unregistered users to contact him using the contact form.

After some testing I see that the last two code lines are the better solution, because with the previous code line the validator doesn’t work, at least in my case.