ita10

Hi, the problem is that I used the custom field, but another user wrote a link with my domain in the message, so it has been indexed! ??

Hi, thanks but I don’t know how to use this workaround… I’m using a plugin and I don’t know if I have to modify some php files or similar. Any suggestions?
Thanks

thanks for the explanation!

Thanks!
I’m waiting for the Plugin Support that send me instructions to install the beta.

I’ll try! Thanks

Yes, I already contacted them for the beta. It’s available just after contacting them.
I customized the search form with all fields (category/taxonomy), what I have to do is:
– change the colour of labels/values
– change the angles of labels
– change the text colours
– change the button background colour
etc

I use Elementor and I added this with a shortcode widget.
I modified the custom CSS, but I don’t know exactly what I have to write…
Do you have suggestions with examples?
I don’t know css, but if I see some example maybe I can solve the problem.

Thanks

I already had installed it, but it’s very difficult to customize style, colours, etc with the free version.
Moreover the mobile responsiveness is awful.

I confirm I updated without problems.
First I deactivate and remove the plugin, then I installed again, without loosing data.
Thanks

If I remove the plugin don’t I loose saved map and markers?

is it breaking again the map? ??
Do I have to wait before updating?

Hi, you can see the widget in the homepage:
https://www.itineriamo.com

Note that here you see the correct version. If I try to modify the field data-skyscanner-widget from ‘SearchWidget’ to ‘MultiVerticalWidget’ I have the problem reported.

I obtained the html code from Skyscanner website and I embedded in my homepage with Elementor. No plugins used.
https://www.partners.skyscanner.net/affiliates/widgets-quick-start

Thanks a lot!

• This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by ita10.
• This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by ita10.
• This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by ita10.

It seems to be the lazy load option!
How can this impact on headings visualization?

you saved me the day! Great!!! ??

Ok, I try to explain in details.
The website is this:
https://www.itineriamo.com
try to search ‘Agosto’ above on the right -> no results

this is an example post:
https://www.itineriamo.com/itinerari/dal-monte-bromo-al-mare-di-lembongan/

In the above section of the post you can see ‘Agosto’ (the website is in italian, I don’t know how you can see this, if Agosto or August)

custom field
https://ibb.co/r3bdhFz

taxonomy (created for another purpose, but same value)
https://ibb.co/vDKxCVy

Relevanssi settings
https://ibb.co/88VbSfG

debug (you can’t see Agosto bot in the taxonomy and in the Custom fields part)
https://ibb.co/Fh3dDC8

• This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by ita10.

Hi, foun Admin serach but how you said there is no difference with the debug way.
For custom field indexing there is the default value ‘all’. Also if I try to specify one by one there is no difference.
Some custom fields or taxonomies are missing completely, not in part.
The content are text and numbers.
The following is a screenshot for the selected taxonomies for indexing. https://ibb.co/pwyTdGH

• This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by ita10.
• This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by ita10.
• This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by ita10.