felipelungov

Sorry, but it’s not actually any of the plugins.

I have the email sent to my Google for Business account, which auto-forwards it to my gmail account. When I look at the source from the Google for Business one, its Reply-To is the same as To. When I look at it in my gmail, then it is the one I input for the user.

It’s interesting that gmail receives the email from the Google for Apps account, which means that it does have the information when it hits the first one. But, for some reason, Google changes it to whatever is in To.

Even more interesting perhaps is that I can’t find the user email in the source for the Google for Business email, even when I search. So it must be encrypted somehow and decrypted by gmail.

Anyways, it looks now that the plugin is fine, I’ll need to take this to Google for Business.

Thanks a lot for your help, linux4me2!!

It’s one of my plugins. I deactivated them all and it worked. I’ll post when I find out which one it is.

I’m using Contact Form 7, I can’t find where to choose between mail() or SMTP. Although I believe my email is also being sent through PHPMailer:

X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.14 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Novo artigo para leitura
X-PHP-Script: liberalismoeconomico.org/index.php for xx.xx.xx.xx
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:52:18 +0000
From: Luan <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.14 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer)
X-WPCF7-Content-Type: text/html
Reply-To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0

Do you know if this means that the plugin really sent the Reply-To header as editoracao@ ? Because if we can rule out that the email client changed it, then I need to start testing to unplug one plugin at a time.

It could be a conflict with another plugin, I guess I will need to test that one by one.

But as far as I know (which is not much), the email client cannot change the Reply-To on its own, can it?

Thanks!

Thank you! Centralizing worked fine (I recommend you making it a built-in feature), and enlarging the calendar could not be done because my license is not premium. But thanks anyways!

I couldn’t find that feature, and by your other reply I thought it wasn’t there. I’m on holidays now, when I’m back I’ll search for it again and if I can’t find it I’ll get in touch. Thanks!

Hi, thanks for your prompt response!

a. Ok. If you add that feature to the plugin (generating the .pot file from the .php files) I’m sure it would be much easier for the whole process to run in a standard way, if that is something the user desires. But of course I have no idea whether that is an easy feature to implement.