brucekaiser

Excellent. Thank you.

The files detected are .doc, docx, and pdf files. They are all legitimate and need to be purged eventually.

I definitely find the file “thecross.jpg” listed in the “Extracting refs from content”.
I have not added this file to anything, so it must be included in some larger collection being generated automatically.
Is there any way to know what page/post was being scanned when it was detected?

On the EDIT MEDIA page for the new media file (thecross.jpg) it says:
“It seems to be used as: CONTENT #14 (URL)”.
I only find/see the automatically created permalink https://trinityvictoria.net/wp1/thecross/

BTW,
On the EDIT MEDIA page for the newly uploaded text file it says:
There is no information about this media in the Cleaner DB. It is either not in use, or the scan hasn’t been ran.
But it also has a permalink: https://trinityvictoria.net/wp1/flowers/
So I don’t think the permalink is what is being referred to above.

Thanks for helping.
Bruce

As a third test, I uploaded a text file into the Media Library and left it unattached. MediaCleaner found it as expected and reported it as “Seems not in use”. So I think this has to do only with image files. Maybe.
Thanks.

I realized finally that the missing days have been left off because they have no events. This makes the calendar list look incomplete while it is not.

Worthy of note, I guess, but it would seem that an option to list empty days might be worthwhile for future versions.

Here is a link to my calendars.
https://www.trinityvictoria.net/wp/this-week/

I have it. Thank you.

Thanks for your response. I’ve experimented with your instructions with better results. I have a couple of additional questions.

Why is normal text being enlarged?
I created a page that includes nothing but an <H1> text and a <p>
text. Simple calendar is not involved with with this page. The font sizes are 27.8px and 14.633px resp. The pdf file produces the text at 31.6px and 16.625px resp. Both are enlarged by 113.6%. Why is this and where is it controlled?

Does PDF&Print recognize inline css placed in the page head code? My theme allows for custom css to be placed in the head code of individual pages. Should I repeat these in the PDF&Print settings page in “Add Custom Styles”?

https://www.trinityvictoria.net/wp/sandbox/

To be completely forthcoming, I want to include this info.

In trying to improve the results, I earlier attempted to upgrade my fonts per the instructions. But the LoadFonts button didn’t seem to do anything.
The link gives a 404 error, and the site is shutdown, but they still show a zip file download for “MPDF_6_0.zip”. I manually downloaded this and extracted the folder “mpdf60”, which I copied to my plugin folder and renamed to “mpdf”, replacing the original mpdf folder.

This all seemed to work, but did not correct the fonts issue, although it did change the results somewhat.

I’d like to know if this was wrong and if I should reinstate the original mpdf folder?

Thanks.

Sorry. I missed your .post. Here is the link

https://www.trinityvictoria.net/wp/test-cal-listing/

Thanks in advance.

After more research, I was able to locate and correct the code as you suggested by modifying the child theme. It resolved the problem. Thanks.

Thanks for the help. I can not find the item you refer to.

We are using Weaver-II-Pro theme which (I believe) generates the style.css on the fly. However there is a child theme that contains a style.css which can be used to customize specific needs. Can you be more specific about what I should look for? I don’t understand why some monthly calendars are effected and other are not.

Bruce

I was wondering if anyone sees this same behavior on their calendars??

Sorry. BTW Ive noticed that some months display properly, but the current month and the starting month (if different) do not. This may not be consistent behavior.

https://www.trinityvictoria.net/wp/test-calendar-from-google/

I reinstalled the V2.6.2 on WP4.1 and I now can find the sql file in the root directory. I guess its all working now.

The sql file has the same name as the “complete” backup file, with an sql extension. Is this intended?

It seems to me that it should have a name containing “database”, rather than “complete”.

Just an upgrade suggestion.
Thanks for the help. Its a great plugin.

That is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.