bolacha_sp

Hey Adam, thank you for your answer!

I’ve figured out what is happening, but don’t know how to fix it yet. Gonna share here and maybe you might give me any tip to solve it :/

The think is, after the listing have been approved and its live, the user can edit it, so if the user edit the title, this bug happens. I had tested this scenario with one test listing, and when I changed this listing to “pending”, I was able to access wp-admin/edit.php?post_type=job_listing, but trying to access wp-admin/edit.php?post_type=job_listing&post_status=pending trowed this 500 error, and when changed this listing to approved, I could not access the active edit.php?post_type=job_listin anymore.

I am using this tutorial “Appending the Job ID to the permalink slug” to change the listing slug, don’t know if is related.

Can you replicate it from your side? I’m not sure if its a bug with the plugin or my theme…

thank you

Thanks for your reply Adam!

You were right, it was my theme causing the conflict. I could fix it and it is now working as expected.

Thank you ??

Hi Ryan,
Thank you, I will be following up the issue.

Hi Ryan,
Lets say I will insert 10 posts, using wp_insert_post inside a plugin.
I will do a loop inserting each posts (with wp_insert_post), and I want only 5 of them to be shared on my social networks, the other five not.

Is there any function to “uncheck” the social sharing options by post id?

Hi Alekv,

Thank you for your reply, i’ve modified line 213 to

$order_total = ($order->get_total()-$order->get_total_shipping());

As I work with physical products, i needed it to remove the shipping cost ??
I guess that would be nice to have some checkbox so the user can choose to include or not shipping cost.

Thank you for this nice plugin!

Hi,

Thank you very much for you fast support!
Yes that fixed the issue, thank you ??

Hi Don,

Yes that would definitely spend a lot of resources on my server.
Thanks for the explanation, I will look for a htaccess solution in this case.

tks

ohhh right now I get it… the sample rate was set to 100, so it would be quite hard to hit “1”.

I understood now, thank you very much!

Hey Stranger, thank you!

Looks like this one is working great on 4.3.x too ??

Same problem here ??