ap6y3jimm
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Gutenberg Block Editor Toolkit – EditorsKit] What happened?After installing the add-on from GitHub, the error finally disappeared, now everything works fine.
So,Where can I read about new changes in the plugin and why did you decide to do it? Does this improve something or is the reason for some compatibility conflicts or do you have other plans for the development of the plugin?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Gutenberg Block Editor Toolkit – EditorsKit] What happened?But how? Perhaps you see it differently than the end user. We don’t see any instructions, or your announcements. What has changed that is no longer available? All I see is that the plugin worked great, and then at one point it needed to be updated and after that it broke. If you know how to set it up correctly, please give instructions, a link to the instructions. And a description of what is the difference between the old and the new?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Gutenberg Block Editor Toolkit – EditorsKit] What happened?Something weird you did with your wonderful plugin. Now it doesn’t work anymore. I uninstall and reinstall again via the standard WP repository. The Editorskit plugin installed, does not display any error or incompatibility messages, or prompt for an update. It just exists in the system, but its previous functionality does not work. I used it to make a business-like font on the legal pages, while the main pages of the site use the Bangers heading font. Now it doesn’t work, unfortunately.
Are you going to fix this or should I forget and look for an alternative solution?Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Gutenberg Block Editor Toolkit – EditorsKit] What happened?Okay, thank you. We are waiting for an update.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [NSFW] [Simple Membership] Need a change color to: swpm-renewal-linkThanks, buddy. Your advice really helped me. The problem is solved.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress] not work in conjunction with my wpformsNo errors found. It’s just that MailChimp’s requests from WpForms are not coming in. WpForms support replied that no problem was found on their side.
If you call yourself a modern company with adequate principles. In relation to customers, this behavior is unacceptable. You cannot unreasonably, ban a client only on some assumptions or speculation. This is the highest degree of disrespect. And I really don't care what algorithms you have there or what kind of checklist you have. No one even contacted me and did not give me any chance or interview, but a blocking followed without any explanation. And this despite the fact that I did not even have time to do anything, nothing at all! On what basis did you decide that I somehow have a bad reputation ?! What nonsense ?! Yes, I can partially understand when some AI systems make the wrong decision on moderation. But people must adequately manage processes. But you ask me to call from Norway to the USA! And in every possible way to prevent the establishment of the communication channel chat or email. In addition, my application was considered for about two weeks without asking me a single question on the merits. That is why I have claims.
Updating:
The problem has been resolved. And the reason was in Jetpack settings.
I must report that after numerous configurations and tests, I found the reason.
If someone has the same problem as my, here’s the answer.Disable the option in Jetpack settings->Settings->Writing->Widgets-> “Enabler widget visibility controls to display widgets only on particular posts or pages”
I don’t know why they added this functionality, but it doesn’t do anything useful other than confusing WP administration even more. By imposing an extra degree of unnecessary control that conflicts with the main one, it is surprising that even they themselves have not been able to find this reason in their own plugin. But they tried. As always referring to the third party caching plugins that I have. However, this is not the case, as has now become clear.
I hope my experience will help you one day. Thank.
I think it’s important to say that:
All accelerator functions are always disabled, and lazy loading of images is disabled. I don’t need them and they were always turned off now. So the problem is not related to this.
Well, the rest of the functions are included, this is a paid plan: Security Daily.If you need further clarification, let me know. I will provide the information you need.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Not efficient at all and crammed with errors.https://monosnap.com/file/QcMBDRxI2q5QgqqT8UbHTZWvvDt1dd
These are indicators without AMP
- This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by ap6y3jimm.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Not efficient at all and crammed with errors.I will take advantage of your offer of constructive help and provide access. If you manage to tweak everything and the GooglePageSpeed ??metrics really grow, I will change my mind and my negative comment.
I understand that you take my comment not glad. But you also understand my reaction to unfulfilled expectations.
I could understand the situation if I had a complex site with rare plugins and a non-standard structure. But I have the simplest site with 11 pages. A minimum of plugins, and only those that are fully compatible and the most popular.
I was hoping that you have definitely tested this configuration and it should work tolerably well. In practice, it turned out that no. Therefore, my reaction is fair. Here is a screenshot of the speed estimate of how I was able to tweak it using the caching plugin. And everything works! Nothing broke including scripts or design. After enabling AMP, the score dropped dramatically and the work of all modules was disrupted6, and even the menu in the basement of the site fell off. You can see for yourself.