Antonin

I had the same problem and realized that the reason was probably the presence of a single quote character in the password. If you happen to have a quote character in your password, try changing your password to see if it solves it.
This issue should be fixed if confirmed.

That, Sir, is first-class support !!
Thank you for your help (AGAIN) and for teaching me a thing or two on the way.
It is of course “resolved” for me, but just a quick question since it is the first time I use a simple “plugin” in that way with just a function and add_action. Shall it be added in the plugin directory and installed like a regular plugin or can I just paste that function and add_action to my functions.php file?
Does it change anything in terms of performance for WordPress?

Again, hats off to you.

Hello,
I asked questions in the past and again, thank you for the prompt response.
I first tried microdata because they present it as the first solution so I thought the chance of compatibility was greater.

I have been able to add the microdata on the body of a post itself and it was detected by Google so it seems it was not stripped away. Is the whitelist you mention specific to certain areas of WordPress?

I will try the microformats. And if you have a plugin ready to add microdata support, I would be interested in having a look as well.

Thank you again for the prompt and detailed help.

Hi,

I also had a same “line-55” error when activating the plugin. If it was fixed, where can we download the correct version? (note: I downloaded it from WordPress Plugin and github after Rinat’s message)

Thank you

Thanks for the lengthy reply.
I get the point and if I bought the Pro Pack, it’s because I couldn’t do it in-house, so I get the complexity you mentioned and how to make it flexible enough for everyone to use.
However, for the cascading pulldowns, it seems it was the way it worked in previous versions (2.0.3 of Store Locator Plus for the one I saw). Was it removed because of the javascript issues you mentioned?

Thanks for the reply.
On the same subject, I’d like to point out my disappointment. I purchased the Pro Pack after seeing the map in action on another website (using the plugin before the fork was made). It was exactly what we needed: A pulldown for the country, then, based on that first information, a pulldown for the city, only showing the cities of that country. I get the logic behind the radius-based model but I think it only applies to cities/states where indeed, crossing from one to the other is no big deal. It is quite different for countries (except in Europe maybe). I have 5 shops in a small country and because of the radius and default store results (25), I get 20 other results in the adjacent country, which is separated by sea(!). Although close, I really don’t think people would go to another country, ESPECIALLY when they have already results coming up in their country.
I know everyone has different expectations and shop structure but I hoped the Pro Pack would answer this basic need (based on previous versions seen).

That post is now long but maybe I can offer a suggestion.
1. Have the filters based on the previous one (as explained above. Country -> City -> Tag (tag filter could be set before or after the geographic filters depending on the user needs – I know I’m being picky here but I just try to think of different situations)).
2. IF a country/state/city shows results already, then display them and IF other shops are close-by (based on default radius) (in a different country/state/city), it could be shown after a jump in the results with a heading like “Other shops in the area…”, to clearly separate the results requested and the suggestions from the system.

Sorry for long comment.
Very happy to discuss it further if not clear enough.

Glad to find that post. I was wondering for a while.

so YES, PLEASE, give us the possibility to treat cities individually. Our map has nothing to do with the US, so we won’t use States at all. Thx.

Dear Ross,
thanks a lot. Your support is really appreciated. That was fast!
It looks a lot like what I tried on my own but couldn’t make it work earlier.

I just tried it and it works. Again, THANK YOU.