Wordfence sub-processors
-
The DPA that Defiant is asking us to sign lists 5 subprocessors – third parties that may have access to our visitors personal data. Among them, Amazon and ByteGrid are presumably acting as hosting services, which sounds perfectly normal and the DPA describes clearly the relationship.
Twilio provides communication services, but no mention is made of to whom. It is not clear why our visitors’ personal data should ever go through Twilio.
Freshworks provides service management services. Once again, I cannot imagine why our visitors’ personal data should ever appear on a ticket hosted by Freshworks.
But Mode Analytics is extremely troubling. The whole purpose of the company is to host AND TO SHARE data. Now, I understand perfectly why Defiant might want to use such a service. But it is not at all clear whether any personal data is placed on that platform, or only aggregate data that CANNOT be traced to individuals. And if personal data is placed on that platform, how in the world can Mode Analytics guarantee its confidentiality if the whole purpose of the service is to share the data with others?
I think all Wordfence users would benefit from clarification of these issues. Are our visitors’ personal data really being handled by ALL of these sub-processors? If so, to do what, precisely? And are these legitimate uses for the purposes of an application firewall, or does GDPR put the entire business model of Defiant into question?
- The topic ‘Wordfence sub-processors’ is closed to new replies.