What used to be a decent directory plugin got botched with the major update
-
I used to be a fan of the Directorist plugin. I use it on a few client websites and I was happy to recommend it to the community. Not anymore.
What used to be a good performing directory plugin, close in feature set and quality to GeoDirectory, got a major downgrade with the much touted version 8.0.This extensively announced v 8.0 game-changer actually expossed the major issues with the Directorist causing the frustration among its user base. I’ll try to summarize some if the issues as a constructive critique that will hopefully nudge the Directorist team to steer the ship in the right direction.
Not listening to users feedback and providing slow and sluggish response to support tickets seams to be the major one. Asking for a postive review as a condition for the support to be provided, is a no no, and no serius company that advocates customer love should be engaging in such practices.
Further, the Directorist plugin has significant room for improvement, especially when it comes to understanding its user base. It feels like the target user persona isn’t clearly defined; it was my understanding that the plugin was aiming for mid-level users, as the lack of flexibility and customization options made it difficult to adopt for developers and more advanced users. That user persona would’ve gravited toward custom based solutions built on top of ACF and FacetWP anyhow. Version 8, with its introduction of the Bricks Buillder adon was supposed to change that. Well, that did not happen, with Bricks extension not living up to expectations. The Bricks adon ended up being a bunch of shortcodes wrapped in builder elements that did not offer any customizationflexibility Bricks users were expecting. On top of that, Bricks’ templating engine and its powerfull query loops cannot be used to customize the single listing post type, nor to apply different tempalte based on defined conditions. A major miss! The lack of integration with Bricks’ core features makes the extension largely ineffective for developers, and I have to question Directorist product manager decision to waste the DEV team time on such useless feture.
In terms of styling and customization options that the user base has long complained about , version 8.0 did not bring any positve change, but rather kept the customization restriction in place and applied the styling that feels rather outdated and that requires extensive CSS customization to fit with your existing website. The user experience would benefit greatly from a modernized design with a focus on user manage customization over imposed styling control. Thsi plugin to let its users display and style data in any way they want, as oppsed to mandating them to apply the Directorist style.
Lastly, for the major change, it does not seam that the Directorist team applied sufficient testing, causing issues and breaking live sites. A stronger emphasis on quality assurance and beta testing would prevent a lot of these problems. To add insult to injury, the Support team does not seem to be living to its promise with users reporting delayed responses to their support tickets that often last days.
At this point, I cannot recommed Directorist to anyone. I am keeping my live sites on old version of the product and will avoid updating it until the v8 is fixed. Hopefully, no security issues will surface in the meantime. I may even consider rebuilding the sites with a new off the shelf product or going fully custom way. The wonders can be done with Bricks + ACF Pro + WS Form.
I would be willing to take a look at Directorist at some future point, providing the users are listened to and the issues with the product are properly and transparently addressed.
- You must be logged in to reply to this review.