Usability Testing Report Summer 2008 vs Project Icon

  • Was the original layout used in the Usability test report included in the votes for Project Icon?

    The Crazy Horse design in the Usability test report is far superior to the icons that are now being used.

    I think a lot of this usability report has been completely wasted.

    How could you move the big “Write New” button in the top left button and replace it with “Dashboard”?

    Is the CSS for the original Crazy Horse UI available?

    I just think this is bizarre.

    You’ve taken a thing of beauty (Crazy Horse) and turned it into some kind of mutant which is no where near as intuitive as the usability findings.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Thread Starter honewatson

    (@honewatson)

    To clarify I am comparing the new interface with the interface used in the usability report. (Crazy Horse)

    On what basis were the changes to Crazy Horse made?

    You cannot claim the original benefits of Crazy Horse apply to the new theme. The new theme simply has too many differences to Crazy Horse in terms of clarity.

    This thread is not for debating whether the new interface is better than 2.5.

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • The topic ‘Usability Testing Report Summer 2008 vs Project Icon’ is closed to new replies.