Square best practice?
-
Hi,
So here’s the current state and issue with one of my sites. The site is configured so that Square is the system of record. The documentation states the following
If you sell via multiple channels (e.g. in-person with Square POS and online), we recommend setting Square as your system of record. Using Square as the system of record is especially helpful if inventory is shared for a Square location.
The first question to the above is why, why is it recommended? Why should you not use Woo as the system of record?
My client sells online and in-person with a POS, I would like to know does she absolutely have to use Square as the system of record or can it be Woo?
The reason I ask is that yesterday my client made a tax change that was applied to all products in Square, this triggered a sync and as Square is the system of record all products that were in more than one category in Woo were subsequently removed from all categories other than the one set in Square, also descriptions were also overwritten! What resulted was a site with empty categories and no sales due to users not being able to see any products.
What I would like to know going forward is this. Can Woo be the main system of record even is she does use POS when shes attending events etc and making sales in person? What is the best way to approach this problem, as this is a rather big issue as in Square a product can only be in one category as opposed to Woo which a product can be in multiple categories?
Another potential solution I was thinking of was to have two square accounts, one only for online sales and another account for offline sales with POS. This would result in two inventories to manage in two square accounts but even that is better than having to manually fix every product when sync overwrites everything?
If anyone has a suggestion on how to handle this that would be really great as this is starting to really be a pain!
- The topic ‘Square best practice?’ is closed to new replies.