Problem – Browser errors were logged to the console

  • Resolved usrobotx

    (@usrobotx)


    1 year, 9 months ago

    Hello,

    I am using WP astra without almost any modifications (just a couple of standard plugins). I installed LiteSpeed cache and activated Advanced Cache (Recommended). The results performance-wise are just super. But in Google Page Speed report some problems appeared. Namely:

    Browser errors were logged to the console. They indicate two problems (For any of the pages, for testing purpuses I tested https://georgiafy.ge/bank-account/ )

    Source: …litespeed-cache/guest.vary.php:1:0(georgiafy.ge) || Description – Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 406 (Not Acceptable)
    Source:/bank-account/:1:0(georgiafy.ge) || Description: SyntaxError: Unexpected token ‘<‘, “<tit”… is not valid JSON

    How can I solve these issues?

    Thanks in advance.

    The page I need help with: [log in to see the link]

Viewing 3 replies - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Thread Starter usrobotx

    (@usrobotx)

    Everything I do, I do for ranking ??

    At this moment I do not know which to choose – LiteSpeed with “SEO Score 98” and Best Practices Score “92”, but with performance “97+” or other caching plugin, which most probably will have SEO and Best practices 100, but I do not know what will be the performance.

    Forget Google Score. Google doesn’t and can’t measure loading time. It only measures the “display time”. The display time starts when all sources from your host are loaded. Google doesn’t consider the time how long it takes to load all sources and honors only the time to display the content in browser window. This means, you can have a lame server, but with best optimizations and you get a high score. On the hand, you can have a very fast server that loads all sources x-times faster, but with no or less optimization and it loads everything x-times faster, but you get a bad score. At the end of the day you must make the loading fast for your users and not for Google.

    Does that sound paradoxical? Yes!

    Thread Starter usrobotx

    (@usrobotx)

    Yep, paradoxical. I agree with you, UX is more important then rankings, but on my case – my site is really tiny, its speed improvements can improve like <0.1 seconds, and on the other hand better ratings mean better ranking. Between these two I have to go for optimizations.

    The only thing that I am not sure is wheter 97 speed (and 92 SEO and Best Practices) is better or whetever another caching platform will lead to (I think 90+ and 100 both SEO and BP)

Viewing 3 replies - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • The topic ‘Problem – Browser errors were logged to the console’ is closed to new replies.