Poor support for third-party optimizations

hey shflbrian ; I’m Autoptimize’s developer. Not sure what your setup is re. optimizing, but Cache Enabler works well with Autoptimize and the pages are stored with optimized HTML/ CSS/ JS/ … so it _can_ work in that context at least.

I use defer.js, but it has been the case with other free plugins as well. I haven’t got into the bigger paid plugins very much. If I can add a hook or something to a plugin to enable compatibility, I will change my review.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 7 months ago by shflbrian.

I’m not deep into CE, but the cache_enabler_before_store filter might be worth looking into? ??

I’ll see if I can learn something, but I assume that is not how you maintain your own plugin’s compatibility with CE.

To add, the optimizer does suggest a cache, meaning they have probably tested this plugin with a cache. https://i.imgur.com/QYwSSrr.png

I assume that is not how you maintain your own plugin’s compatibility with CE.

AO uses output buffering in order not to depend on any caching plugin.

It seems this review is used like a support thread. It would be nice if it gets removed.

We recommend the AO plugin made by @optimizingmatters

@shflbrian this review is false and misleading. @optimizingmatters was correct, the cache_enabler_before_store filter can be used to modify the page before it’s cached by Cache Enabler.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 3 months ago by Anonymous User 16850768.

I use defer.js, but it has been the case with other free plugins as well. I haven’t got into the bigger paid plugins very much. If I can add a hook or something to a plugin to enable compatibility, I will change my review.

@shflbrian following up as I’ve not heard back yet. You’ve been provided a filter hook that existed before the time of you posting this review. This means you’ve left a false, misleading review. Do you plan on updating it?