Poor Performance

Hello @teminet

Thank you for reaching out and I am happy to help!
In the case you are mentioning, there is not much any caching method can do to improve the time of 0.00234s
The setup guide shows the results and in this case, it’s much faster to fetch objects from the DB directly, than to save and fetch them from memory/disk.

Please note that the time is set in milliseconds and not seconds and as I’ve mentioned before, not much can top 2.34ms

Are you experiencing the same problem with Page Cache for example?

Thanks!

Thank you very much for your interest.

Page cache and database cache tests are as shown in the attached images and there does not seem to be much of a problem.

In fact, I attribute the reason why redis and memcached lost the fight in the Object Cache test to the fact that there is no traffic on the site at the moment. I wonder if I’m right? I think they will perform better when traffic increases. So, in the current situation, does it make more sense to choose none for object cache?

• This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by teminet.

Hello @teminet

Thank you for your feedback.
As you can see, the impact is huge when it comes to Page caching and DB caching in your case.

Every website is different and Object Caching is not necessarily what you should focus on. In this case, you should keep OC disabled and once you start getting some traffic, re-test this and check the information provided by the guide. You can always make adjustments to the configuration

Thanks!

Thanks.

Hello @vmarko

You are most welcome!

We would really appreciate it if you could take a minute and post a review here. This will help us to continue offering a top-notch product to users.
Thanks!