Plugin Increases Server Load Time

Hi,

you just need to refresh it again to make sure cache hit

when cache is missed , it will have to buffer the output and run other optimization if you set , that will increase some TTFB on first access.

Best regards,

Even when I refresh the page, the score is still low.

Hi,

90-ish is not low

and Reduce initial server response time is gone if you refresh/repeat the test

Best regards,

Even when I refresh the page, the score is still low.

<a href="https://t.dcompany.site/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">https://t.dcompany.site/</a>
I receive a score of 72 and one of 80.  I also had the following suggestions:
Remove unused CSS
…cssjs/6462d.css?44cb6
Minimize main-thread work 2.5 s
Category
Time Spent
Other
1,310 ms
Style & Layout
863 ms
Parse HTML & CSS
148 ms
Script Evaluation
100 ms
Rendering
92 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation
36 ms

<a href="https://lazyjack.blog/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">https://lazyjack.blog/</a>
I receive a score of 73 and one of 60.  I also had the following suggestions:

Reduce the impact of third-party code Third-party code blocked the main thread for 480 ms
Third-Party
Transfer Size
Main-Thread Blocking Time
Google Analytics	
52 KiB
293 ms
/analytics.js(www.google-analytics.com)
18 KiB
204 ms
/gtm/js?id=OPT-5NWPB8G&t=gtag_UA_185…_1&cid=165….160…(www.google-analytics.com)
34 KiB
89 ms
Google Tag Manager	
76 KiB
186 ms
/gtag/js?id=UA-185…-1&l=dataLayer&cx=c(www.googletagmanager.com)
76 KiB
186 ms
Other Google APIs/SDKs	
0 KiB
0 ms
Minimize main-thread work 4.2 s
Category
Time Spent
Other
1,475 ms
Script Evaluation
1,357 ms
Style & Layout
759 ms
Parse HTML & CSS
279 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation
217 ms
Rendering
120 ms
Garbage Collection
16 ms
Reduce JavaScript execution time 1.4 s
URL
Total CPU Time
Script Evaluation
Script Parse
https://lazyjack.blog
1,351 ms
72 ms
17 ms
Unattributable
1,201 ms
18 ms
1 ms
…jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.5.1(lazyjack.blog)
329 ms
269 ms
28 ms
/analytics.js(www.google-analytics.com)
298 ms
262 ms
12 ms
/gtag/js?id=UA-185…-1&l=dataLayer&cx=c(www.googletagmanager.com)
297 ms
254 ms
33 ms
…gtag/js?id=UA-185…-1(lazyjack.blog)
222 ms
182 ms
27 ms
/gtm/js?id=OPT-5NWPB8G&t=gtag_UA_185…_1&cid=165….160…(www.google-analytics.com)
212 ms
178 ms
21 ms
…cssjs/263e1.js?0078a(lazyjack.blog)
101 ms
7 ms
8 ms
…cssjs/25ce1.js?9db7e(lazyjack.blog)
58 ms
33 ms
21 ms

I also received this warning in the console
The resource https://lazyjack.blog/wp-content/litespeed/cssjs/c4917.css?d51e6 was preloaded using link preload but not used within a few seconds from the window’s load event. Please make sure it has an appropriate as value and it is preloaded intentionally.

https://t.dhostingsites.com/
I receive a score of 50 and one of 47.

Poor Metrics
Speed Index 3.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint 6.7 s
Time to Interactive 5.2 s
Total Blocking Time 2,560 ms

I also had the following suggestions:
Minimize main-thread work 7.1 s
Category
Time Spent
Script Evaluation
2,928 ms
Other
2,125 ms
Style & Layout
1,405 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation
226 ms
Rendering
192 ms
Parse HTML & CSS
163 ms
Garbage Collection
21 ms
Reduce JavaScript execution time 3.1 s
Total CPU Time
Script Evaluation
Script Parse
…cssjs/5d082.js?bbe17(t.dhostingsites.com)
3,489 ms
2,549 ms
194 ms
https://t.dhostingsites.com
2,245 ms
64 ms
23 ms
Unattributable
1,295 ms
294 ms
1 ms

I also received the following warning in the console
The resource https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0.js was preloaded using link preload but not used within a few seconds from the window’s load event. Please make sure it has an appropriate as value and it is preloaded intentionally.

• This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by Yui.
• This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by Yui. Reason: please use CODE button for proper formatting

Hi,

I am seeing 80-ish score on https://t.dhostingsites.com/

The resource https://lazyjack.blog/wp-content/litespeed/cssjs/c4917.css?d51e6 was preloaded using link preload but not used within a few seconds from the window’s load event. Please make sure it has an appropriate as value and it is preloaded intentionally.

you can disable HTTP2 push if it is giving your adverse effect.

Best regards,

Everyone I sent my website to for testing of the page speed score is showing it is low for all the domains listed. An 80-ish score is still low for using a plugin that is supposed to speed up a website. I am trying to get a score of 90+.

Here are the results for different pages on https://t.dhostingsites.com/. I have AMP turned off on all the pages types for the website. It is only turned on for posts. The website is loading so slow, I am unable to get a score for most of the pages on GTmetrix and PageSpeed Insights.

Hi,

An 80-ish score is still low for using a plugin that is supposed to speed up a website

speed is not equal to score

I’ve seen 10-seconds-loading-site scored 80-ish and 2-seconds-loading-site scored 30-ish

Best regards,

How do I fix the server load time error? How do I improve my PageSpeed scores? They are really low.

GTmetrix Scores

• Start Here Page
• Contact Page
• Shop Page

Page Speed Insights Scores
I could only test two pages. The rest of the pages showed errors.

• Home Page
• Start Here Page

take this as example

https://gtmetrix.com/reports/t.dhostingsites.com/sOY883xl/

you were testing it with cache miss, which result in 5.4 seconds

https://gtmetrix.com/reports/t.dhostingsites.com/WHpJlgcj/

the same page, second test, as cache generated and hit , reduced to 1.2 seconds.

I don’t understand the difference between the tests on GTmetrix.

What about use PageSpeed Insights or using the Lighthouse tool? PageSpeed Insights tool can’t even test some of the pages on my website. The Lighthouse tool has consistently given me a low score.

I am getting this

from the warning it says , we can’t do anything about “remove unused JS”

but for preload font , you can try add this into your .htaccess

RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} !ls_smartpush [NC]
RewriteRule ^.*$ - [ENV=PRELOAD:true]
Header add Link "</wp-content/themes/twentytwenty/assets/fonts/inter/Inter-upright-var.woff2>; rel=preload;as=font;crossorigin=anonymous" env=PRELOAD

Best regards,

Your documentation is confusing. It doesn’t give information on how to use the settings to improve PageSpeed score. The documentation just says it does.

I am running the Lighthouse test in an incognito window for the pages on t.dhostingsites.com. I can’t get the performance score above 50 on any of my main pages. I ran the test twice for each page.

How can I implement the following suggestions by using your plugin?

1. Reduce initial server response time
2. Preconnect to required origins (https://pixel.wp.com, https://www.googletagmanager.com, https://www.google-analytics.com)
3. Preload key requests
4. Minimize main-thread work
5. Reduce JavaScript execution time

Inserting the code you suggested did not improve the Preload key requests error I was receiving.

Hi,

1) re-test it , once cache is generated and saved , this error should be goner.

2) how did you inserted them ?

3) try

Header add Link "</wp-content/themes/twentytwenty/assets/fonts/inter/Inter-upright-var.woff2>

change the font path accordingly , to the warning it gives

sadly we can’t do anything for 4) and 5)

Best regards,

2) how did you inserted them ?

I used the Google Site Kit plugin.

3) The code is not working. I tried both:
Header add Link "</wp-content/themes/twentytwenty/assets/fonts/inter/Inter-upright-var.woff2>"

Header add Link "</wp-content/themes/twentytwenty/assets/fonts/inter/Inter-upright-var.woff2>

Any update?