Performance Issues with HUSKY Filters

  • Resolved djwilko12

    (@djwilko12)


    1 year ago

    Hello,

    I am writing to seek assistance with a performance issue I am experiencing on my WooCommerce site, specifically when using the HUSKY (formerly WOOF) filters in conjunction with the LiteSpeed Cache plugin. While the LiteSpeed Cache generally works excellently, I’ve noticed a significant slowdown in page loading times when the HUSKY filters are active, compared to the standard WooCommerce filters.

    I would appreciate any guidance or recommendations on how to optimize the LiteSpeed Cache settings to better accommodate the HUSKY filters. Are there specific configurations within LiteSpeed that I should adjust to improve compatibility and performance with these advanced WooCommerce filters?

    Additionally, if there are known issues or best practices for using LiteSpeed Cache with WooCommerce filtering plugins like HUSKY, that information would be highly beneficial.

    Thank you!

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    please provide the report number , you can get it in toolbox -> report -> click “send to LiteSpeed”

    Thread Starter djwilko12

    (@djwilko12)

    Thanks

    Herw you have:?YIJHEHJR

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    which page has this filter ?

    Thread Starter djwilko12

    (@djwilko12)

    you can click any category on the menu and you will see the left sidebar with filters

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    huh ? the page itself loads around 900ms on cache miss , and filter also responded on me like 900ms , that’s not something I would described as “slow”

    Thread Starter djwilko12

    (@djwilko12)

    thanks for your reply .

    you never cache the filtered results right ? That is always dynamic and is bypassed by Litespeed cache ?

    Or is there any kind of optimization from Litespeed cache side ?

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    yes, I can see x-litespeed-cache: miss header which indicates the page was not cached upon my previous result.

    Not really a performance issue but I am wondering how the filters get applied to actual products on by vendors? There is no way to connect it on the site and what the vendors add as their products.

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The topic ‘Performance Issues with HUSKY Filters’ is closed to new replies.