Not thrilled with it, but not overly disappointed
-
I’ll start by saying my initial reaction to Gutenberg was a bit negative. Even in a field where things are constantly changing (web development), I sometimes stand by the age-old motto, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” That said, I gave this editor a try on a few staging websites. I like the way the blocks work for the most part, and the UI is very clean. Most of the old options are still relatively easy to find, but I do have a few complaints, or perhaps I should say, concerns.
- When a post is saved, the green notification bar covers the box for editing the post slug, and it has to be dismissed in order to access it again.
- The editing area is tiny on larger screens. There is an immense amount of whitespace on either side once the screen gets to a certain size. It would be awesome if the editor were made more responsive. The old TinyMCE editor filled the entire left column of the screen on any size monitor.
- Images are not mobile responsive at all. They break the layout on smaller screens, and they squish the text when they are put inline with paragraphs (this does not affect the front end, but it’s kind of annoying to deal with in the editor).
- HTML blocks break if you put, for example: an opening tag in an HTML block, another block (paragraph, list, etc.), and then finally a closing tag in another HTML block.
I may try to report some of these on Github when I have the time. Hopefully they will be fixed down the line. All in all, though, I’m fairly satisfied with the editor.
Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘Not thrilled with it, but not overly disappointed’ is closed to new replies.