• Resolved mohdaljaraba

    (@mohdaljaraba)


    Hello,

    I was reading this comparison link
    and i found also some who wrote the speed for each plugin ,and i wondering what its make that plugin loading the page faster , Image why LiteSpeed Cache cant do it!

    best regards

Viewing 11 replies - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    Hi,

    Yeah well , we will need more information , just give a screenshot like that doesn’t mean anything , I can just make a screenshot , or table shows like this:

    LiteSpeed : 0.5 seconds

    XX cache : 1 seconds

    YY cache : 2 seconds

    ZZ cache : 3 seconds

    by more information like , what was server set up , what was client set up , how was test measured , what was setting on all sides …etc

    and such comparison should make all aspect as equal as possible.

    and you know what , don’t ask me , because the any answer you get here , from me or other LiteSpeed users , is probably biased already.

    the best way , is for yourself to do the test ??

    and make sure , all the settings must be equal or as same as possible , you don’t compare things with a well-tuned setting to a default setting.

    Best regards,

    Thread Starter mohdaljaraba

    (@mohdaljaraba)

    Hi @qtwrk

    No the screenshot I toke it from one of the theme developer which they compare the price as well , for me to try no thank you I’m satisfied with litespeed cache but I was curious really for the huge commercial which bloggers and vloggers making it with nr. .5s load with this plugin and with another plugin 3s maybe something hard for me to understand for my little knowledge of coding

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    Hi,

    yeah well , but for only having a screenshot like that , there is no way for us to know , to analyze what happens on that test

    Best regards,

    Thread Starter mohdaljaraba

    (@mohdaljaraba)

    Hi @qtwrk

    I found it Link

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    Hi,

    the link , didn’t explain in detail , so I can only guess 2 things

    1. maybe some difference in configuration on each plugins

    2. the server is not LiteSpeed WebServer , as LiteSpeed cache is server-side feature , so if you run plugin on non-LiteSpeed server, like Apache , then caching won’t work at all , only page optimization works.

    that’s my conclusion with limited information given by that link.

    a quote from it

    What is LiteSpeed Cache?
    LiteSpeed Cache is a bit different from all the other plugins we feature on the list, as while it works in the standard way across all different web hosts, it also offers LiteSpeed exclusive features to supercharge your website.

    LiteSpeed is a server-side technology, and unless you’re super geeky or happen to be on hosting that makes use of LiteSpeed, you likely won’t use the LiteSpeed features, if you are though they’ll make your site sing.

    Best regards

    Thread Starter mohdaljaraba

    (@mohdaljaraba)

    @qtwrk

    Actually I’m using litespeed server but its shared hosting so I think its limited, for me to make my website singing ??

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    no , i mean that link’s test , if it’s done on non-LiteSpeed server, then it’s logical to have bad result like that , as it was literally a PHP dynamic page, instead of cached page.

    you can check your page’s header, make sure you see “x-litespeed-cache: hit”

    Thread Starter mohdaljaraba

    (@mohdaljaraba)

    @qtwrk

    Connection keep alive
    X-LiteSpeed-Cache hit
    Server litespeed

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    so it is singing.

    Thread Starter mohdaljaraba

    (@mohdaljaraba)

    @qtwrk

    Thank you for all these information , i wish the best for litespeed team , and as usual waiting ur updates for the best .

    Be safe

    Plugin Support qtwrk

    (@qtwrk)

    thanks , wish you the best and be safe as well ??

Viewing 11 replies - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • The topic ‘Just a question’ is closed to new replies.