HTML in text – no paragraphs
-
Sorry, I’m back again. Members are complaining about no paragraphs. This is an example of the latest post.
RevFrank wrote:
<p>My first reaction to this article was, “Oh, no . . . not another of these debates on God’s will!” Until I read Madeline L’Engle’s phrase ” . . . I do not have to make the repulsive theological error of feeling that I have to see cancer as God’s will for my husband. I do not want anything to do with that kind of God.”</p><p>Repulsive theological errors . . . what a wonderful phrase!!!</p><p>I often wonder, though, if, in these debates, people are willing to recognize that we all have mental boxes we inhabit. Some, one might say many, have very small boxes. That is, their worldviews are set in stone and don’t allow for anything to get in or get out. Some minds are like cement, all mixed up and permanently set. Others seem to recognize that they think inside a box but their walls are more porous and so their box is expandable.</p><p>I no longer am willing to describe “GOD” in human etymology — we cannot, should not, use human terms to describe “GOD”, nor should we relegate “GOD” to descriptions of what we human use, in order to give some order to our thoughts about “GOD”. Therefore, I cannot presume to give “GOD” meaning in my terms. That’s why L’Engle’s term “repulsive theology” resonates with me. One of my theology professors once said, in a discussion on ‘theology’ and the ‘meaning of God’, “Religion was just fine until the theologians got their hands on it!” So true!</p><p>I think the last paragraph of the article quoting Romans 8:38-39 is right on. I honestly think that it is our own interpretation that removes us from God, not God removing himself, or imposing himself on us. </p><p> </p>
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
- The topic ‘HTML in text – no paragraphs’ is closed to new replies.