• scotthendrix7755

    (@scotthendrix7755)


    I have looked all over, but not really found an answer to this,,,,,,If my wordpress blog does not use a static home page, but uses my recent posts as my front page, how should the heading tags be…..I viewed the code, and it has the site title as h1 and tagline as h2 since in the head……the posts on that page(each have read more) all have H1 tags…..pretty much, the site title has an h1 tag no matter where you go on my site……..since the posts are really what’s important on the front page, should i make the site title h2 and the tagline h3 in the header php code, or should i leave them as is?….only thing i have found sort of, is that with html 5, it doesnt matter if you have multi h1 headings, but i’m not sure if the site title being h1 is affecting my posts rankings that have h1 too………I also noticed that when you go to the page the post is actually at, you also get this H1 …..
    <nav class=”navigation post-navigation” role=”navigation”>
    <h1 class=”screen-reader-text”>Post navigation</h1>
    <div class=”nav-links”>
    I’m not even sure what that is or if it should be H1

    any help is appreciated
    my recently started blog is https://scamburner.com if you would like to see the source

Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Andrew Nevins

    (@anevins)

    WCLDN 2018 Contributor | Volunteer support

    since the posts are really what’s important on the front page, should i make the site title h2 and the tagline h3 in the header php code,

    The heading levels are there to map out relationships between content on a page. You should be careful to change them unless you’re changing the page structure, or unless the heading levels suck to begin with ??

    Let’s look at the heading structure of your home page… The heading levels aren’t too crazy, but yes they don’t make much sense.
    Here they are: https://snag.gy/z0JQb.jpg

    Your level 1 heading is okay, that’s the name of the site. That’s fine.

    The level 2 heading, “A place to prevent others from getting burned” is fine too but that’s not entire necessary. You can have a description below the level 1 heading, but it doesn’t have to be a level 2 heading. By having a level 2 heading that now means all other headings on the page should be of a higher level (level 3 – 6). If you feel that shouldn’t be the case then don’t use a level 2 heading for the “A place to prevent…” description. A <p> tag is just fine.

    Then you have level 1 headings for your post titles. Yes, this doesn’t make much sense. It’s like it makes redundant your original level 1 heading. It takes away the relationship between your post titles and your page title because the headings are at the same level.

    You also have level 3 headings for the text, “Please follow & like us” and “Archives” – But this is strange because to have a level 3 heading would assume it relates to its previous level heading, which is “How Walmart Scammed My Day Away”. Forget the fact that a level 2 heading is missing for now (that’s still an issue).

    Finally the level 2 heading, “Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)” doesn’t fit anywhere being a level 2.

    So, apart from the Page Title there doesn’t seem to be much right with the heading level structure on that page.

    People using assistive technologies especially, people with visual impairments who may not be able to see the page, use the levels in headings to build up a mental model of the page. Poor heading levels & weird structure can disrupt this model.

    If you want to fix your heading structure I would strive for this: https://snag.gy/uLY20.jpg

    Andrew Nevins

    (@anevins)

    WCLDN 2018 Contributor | Volunteer support

    Personally I go for this layout: https://snag.gy/G9HTn.jpg
    I put a level 2 heading just to outline the navigation section so that it helps people find it, and since it’s the first heading on the page I don’t want it to represent all other headings (so I don’t make it level 1).

    Then I restart at level 1 afterwards, and increment the level only if the content relates to the prior heading. It’s quite simple that way.

    Andrew Nevins

    (@anevins)

    WCLDN 2018 Contributor | Volunteer support

    By the way if you want SEO advice you’re better going to Google’s forums and getting it from them directly: https://groups.google.com

    Thread Starter scotthendrix7755

    (@scotthendrix7755)

    thanx, i use yoast, does this plugin have something to do with the headings mess-ups, or would it be the theme?……and on your second screen shot u sent, is that what you would use as a formula on the main recent posts page, as you strive for screenshot b4 that shows different?

    Thread Starter scotthendrix7755

    (@scotthendrix7755)

    i believe I got it the way you had in the first screenshot (not positive tho), tho didnt use the <p> for the tagline, because it appeared in writing on the site head. So i changed it to a h3 (not sure if a better way to do that)….I’m assuming the 2nd screen shot was for the category php or something and not the home (again not sure)…….would it pay to make the posts h1 in home and make the site title h2 in the head, since the posts is what i am trying to rank for on the recent posts page?

    Andrew Nevins

    (@anevins)

    WCLDN 2018 Contributor | Volunteer support

    I’m assuming the 2nd screen shot was for the category php or something and not the home (again not sure)

    Oops sorry for the confusion, the 2nd screenshot was for the Home page

    Thread Starter scotthendrix7755

    (@scotthendrix7755)

    so what your 2nd screenshot is saying for a recent posts page home page is do this?….

    missing h1 is because we are starting with an h2

    h2 outlining the names of the categories(i’m guessing at that because the cats would be where people navigate to the articles on my site)

    h1 page title(which i’m guessing would be the name of the blog)

    h2 main section{the individual cat names i’m guessing would be the main sections)

    h3 news stories under main section would be the actual article posts

    then back up to h2 for the sidebar and footer…….

    i understand pretty much the structure thing i think, it needs to relate to the next tag down in order, or go back up as even with the above tag.

    This isn’t really about seo anymore, and i realize my analysis is probably wrong, but just trying to understand your layout in the 2nd screenshot.

    thanx again

    Andrew Nevins

    (@anevins)

    WCLDN 2018 Contributor | Volunteer support

    To clarify, when you say “2nd screenshot” you are definitely referring to this screenshot: https://snag.gy/uLY20.jpg ?

    Thread Starter scotthendrix7755

    (@scotthendrix7755)

    no, that was your first one, the 2nd is https://snag.gy/G9HTn.jpg

    Andrew Nevins

    (@anevins)

    WCLDN 2018 Contributor | Volunteer support

    Oh yeah, so that was just showing how I tackle heading levels in my websites (in general).

    so what your 2nd screenshot is saying for a recent posts page home page is do this?….

    I can help you illustrate the heading levels in relation to that screenshot on another page that you want, the recent posts page? Or another? Let me know the URL thanks! ??

    Thread Starter scotthendrix7755

    (@scotthendrix7755)

    hmm, my home page is a recent posts page, I have no static homepage, so I guess that one would be best to help with…….pretty new to this, so only other pages in a blog I see that may be important are where the posts reside, which i guess are the category pages……….problem is tho, in wordpress, the header appears on every page or section, so it has the same level h tag no matter where it is. i figure once I get it right with one blog will be routine in future ones, so any help appreciated.

    Thread Starter scotthendrix7755

    (@scotthendrix7755)

    the recent post page is the page i would like help with in relation to that screenshot, the url is https://scamburner.com

Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • The topic ‘h1 tags and front blog posts page questions’ is closed to new replies.