Foot note number link does not increment correctly

  • Hi,
    Sometimes foot note number links are not incremented accordingly to the parsed text order of appearance: (2) is followed by (3), then (1) and (4).
    The user is a little bit lost with this inconsistency.
    It looks like the footnote creation date is playing a role in this.
    Is there a simple way to fix it with the order of appearance of mapped items as only criteria?

    Thanks

    The page I need help with: [log in to see the link]

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Plugin Author CreativeMindsSolutions

    (@creativemindssolutions)

    Hi,

    I see that your page has many tabs, I couldn’t find the footnotes in the text, but I assume the order in which they are appearing is the order in which the page is being parsed. If you think it’s about the date, clearing the cache should fix the issue.

    Thread Starter oxspray

    (@oxspray)

    Thanks for your answer.
    I reduced the content as you can see now easily (under “Préambule”) the strange behavior of the foot notes numbering.
    “photographie(1)” should have the number (2) as it is the second foot note link in the text. “voyance(2)” is the first note link and should be (1). “Rimbaud(3)” is the last, so (3) is correct.

    “photographie(1)” is the latest created foot note so may be your plugin is considering latest database entries when it parses the text and doesn’t take in account their positions of appearance in the text?

    I don’t use the foot notes internal caching system option.

    Thanks.

    Plugin Author CreativeMindsSolutions

    (@creativemindssolutions)

    Hi,

    This indeed looks weird, perhaps it’s a bug. Could you please open a support ticket by sending e-mail at [email protected] with the WP credentials to your site, so we can log in and check the settings. Please mention in the description the link to this topic.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Foot note number link does not increment correctly’ is closed to new replies.