Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • I believe the Google Font API is faster because the user does not need to download fonts from your own server (especially if you’re on a shared server). And you wouldn’t have to deal with copyright issues.

    I have never noticed a difference in load times, even after using local custom fonts, on shared hosting

    Just some input…..

    Yes, I suppose any load time difference would be in the millisecond range.

    Thread Starter brevityness

    (@brevityness)

    Is there a way to load the fonts from my own server as a backup in case the Google Font doesn’t load?

    I don’t think so…but you could find free alternatives for the fonts you decide to use and serve those from your own server. Then just add those fonts to your font stacks…

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • The topic ‘@font-face vs. Google Font: Which is faster?’ is closed to new replies.