• Resolved josephweaver

    (@josephweaver)


    I get an extra number next to the thumbs up icon for each like, and an extra number next to the comments icon for each comment just fine, so that’s not a problem.

    But when there are other Facebook reactions mixed in there (i.e. Love, Cry, Wow, Angry), they don’t appear at all. I don’t really care if they all show up as “Likes”, that’s fine with me, but I’d like them to show up somehow.

    For instance:
    – If I have 1 “like” and 0 “loves”, I see 1 “like”.
    – If I have 1 “like” and 1 “wow”, I see 1 “like”. I would like to see 2 “likes” instead.
    – If I have 0 “likes” and 3 “loves”, I see nothing. I would like to see 3 “likes” instead.

    Does this make sense?

    Thanks.

    Also, on a side note:
    I notice that inside of .fts-likes-shares-etc-wrap, there’s just text instead of there being any padding or margin applied to either the likes/comments or the “View on facebook” link. There are 3  s hard coded between, but those show up whether there are any likes or comments or not, leaving the appearance of left margin or padding on the “View on Facebook” link, which is undesirable.

    Also also:
    Would it be possible to group fts-jal-fb-user-name and fts-jal-fb-post-time into some kind of container for just those 2 elements, in case someone wanted to style them together with display:inline-block;, but would have to detect wrapping before figuring out any bottom margin? I can provide a screenshot if necessary.

    Also x3:
    Could you pretty please remove the <div class='clear'></div>s and create some ::after {clear:both;} pseudo elements in their place? That’d make the HTML markup more semantic, and also allow people with only CSS access (i.e. me! :P) to be able to choose when to clear elements or display them with floats properly carried on, as per my layout wishes.

    Thanks for listening! ??

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Plugin Author slickremix

    (@slickremix)

    @josephweaver We will be looking into the reactions addition in the next major update. And as for your other points I will look into those as well ?? Thanks for taking the time to post!

    Spencer

    Thread Starter josephweaver

    (@josephweaver)

    No problem!

    Another thing, also for FB posts, if you could group fts-jal-fb-message into the .fts-jal-fb-vid-wrap, .fts-jal-fb-link-wrap, or whatever the main container for the post content is, *instead* of grouping it in with .fts-jal-fb-top-wrap, I think that would make much more sense overall, from an architecture standpoint.

    As it is, I’m having to style things awkwardly to affect both pieces (first, the message text container .fts-jal-fb-top-wrap > .fts-jal-fb-message, and then also, the main linked content container .fts-jal-fb-vid-wrap/.fts-jal-fb-link-wrap/etc.) separately.

    What do you think of that?

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by josephweaver.
    • This reply was modified 7 years, 10 months ago by josephweaver.
Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Facebook “Reactions” Don’t Count as “Likes”? (Plus more questions/comments)’ is closed to new replies.