Defer offscreen images

  • Resolved masouddarvishi1992

    (@masouddarvishi1992)


    3 weeks, 5 days ago

    hello. Your plugin doesn’t apply to lazy load images?

    After installing the plugin and configuring it, these messages appear in the pagespeed.web.dev tool for my site:

    Defer offscreen images

    Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Plugin Author Donncha O Caoimh (a11n)

    (@donncha)

    Hi,

    This plugin caches the HTML pages sent by your server to your browser. WordPress itself adds the lazy loading tags required by modern browsers, so if they’re added to your images, the tags will be cached by WP Super Cache as part of the page.

    It doesn’t define the cache policy for static assets, either. However, if you install Jetpack Boost, that will allow your site to use a CDN and offload serving images to another server.

    Donncha

    Thread Starter masouddarvishi1992

    (@masouddarvishi1992)

    @donncha thank you very much I solved this problem by coding. Responsive size should be defined for images.
    You made a good plugin! It has the most compatibility on the Litespeed web server. It seems that it does not use the file caching method (like other cache plugins)? It is very good.

    Plugin Support Tamirat B. (a11n)

    (@tamirat22)

    Hi @masouddarvishi1992 ,

    Thanks for getting back to us.

    ?It seems that it does not use the file caching method (like other cache plugins)?

    As my colleague mentioned, site caching on WP Super Cache mainly involves generating static HTML files from your dynamic site and serving them to visitors for optimized performance.

    Jetpack Boost, which is a solution developed by the same people behind WP Super Cache, can help you explore other caching functionalities for resources like static files, images, and so on.

    Hope this helps! If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to reply to this thread.

    Thank you!

    Thread Starter masouddarvishi1992

    (@masouddarvishi1992)

    @tamirat22 a lot of cache plugins that do complex caching, cause damage to the site’s SEO, and I have experienced this completely. That’s why your plugin is better for now and I hope it remains optimal and doesn’t look for complicated caching.

    Plugin Support Paulina H. (a11n)

    (@pehaa)

    Hi @masouddarvishi1992,

    a lot of cache plugins that do complex caching, cause damage to the site’s SEO, and I have experienced this completely. That’s why your plugin is better for now and I hope it remains optimal and doesn’t look for complicated caching.

    Thank you for your feedback! We appreciate that! If you haven’t already, please consider adding a plugin review.

    I’ll mark this thread as resolved for now, but if there’s anything more we can assist you with, please don’t hesitate to reach out.?

    Thanks!

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.