Deceptive Posts Discovered

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Moderator Ipstenu (Mika Epstein)

    (@ipstenu)

    ?????? Advisor and Activist

    Not really. I mean, it’s a little spammy, btu it’s also from over a year ago and at this point, isn’t helping his SEO any.

    If he did it on a bunch of 9 month old posts, we’d delete them, but they actually ARE on topic and somewhat accurate and helpful.

    Why d you feel it’s “flagrantly underhanded”?

    Thread Starter kirkearl

    (@kirkearl)

    I’m sorry I mis-read these. I thought he was somehow including his site as part of the fix. A workmate called it ‘black-hat seo’ but I see now it’s not.

    However after looking closer this isn’t the true fix for this problem. The problem is the erroneous ‘link:’ in the URL.

    My apologies for reading it wrong.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Deceptive Posts Discovered’ is closed to new replies.