Consent value instead of label

  • Resolved ricklock

    (@ricklock)


    2 months, 2 weeks ago

    When I receive an email after a submission from a consent field, it is displayed as:

    Consent
    checked

    because I do not want to provide a label to it but instead use what I would call a value/description (textarea field in the consent field edit).

    1. Is it possible to have that value instead of the “Consent” text and checked to stay as it is?
    2. Is it possible to have “unchecked” for consent fields that are unchecked? Right now, submission is empty for those.

    Thanks.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Plugin Support Patrick – WPMU DEV Support

    (@wpmudevsupport12)

    Hi @matcaddy

    I hope you are doing well.

    I am afraid it is not possible, a workaround is to have the single macros in the email, for example {email-1} and then hard code the “checked” / “unchecked” or any of your text, duplicate the email and add a conditional to send them based on the Consent field https://wpmudev.com/docs/wpmu-dev-plugins/forminator/#conditions-tab

    Other than that it would require custom coding which is out of our support scope.

    For that, you’ll need to hire a developer to provide the required custom code for you. WordPress provides a jobs directory here https://jobs.wordpress.net/, if you need further advice about it, feel free to email [email protected].

    Subject: ATTN: WPMU DEV support – wp.org

    Best Regards
    Patrick Freitas

    Thread Starter ricklock

    (@ricklock)

    Thank you. That is pretty much what I was using. I was hoping there was a way to do it without the extra step.

    I also hide the email fields with CSS so that the user doesn’t see the redundant information.
    What I still find annoying is that even if I hide it with display:none, whenever a Consent checkbox is checked, for some reason extra space (margin) appears below it (where the hidden email field is).

    Thread Starter ricklock

    (@ricklock)

    I’m marking this as resolved but described functionality would be a nice addition.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.