Concerns over Classic Editor Long-Term
-
I have decided I will permanently use the Classic Editor plugin. Gutenberg breaks my Academic Blogger’s Toolkit plugin, which is irreplaceable for what I am doing, which is rigorous scientific writing.
My question is this: For the great many of us who will be sticking with the Classic Editor, what is going to happen to us long-term? Are we going to end up having security vulnerabilities? Will they day come when switching to Gutenberg is no longer a choice? Will the classic editor still continue to receive attention? I fear the claim that “we always have the option to stick with the classic editor” may in the long-term just be lip service.
One thing that would really make me feel better is that the Gutenberg team actually has a plan for evaluating the success of Gutenberg after it is released, and having a path to actually choosing to abandon the project and revert to the Classic Editor, if that is what the evaluation indicates. I understand that people can be unduly negative sometimes in their reviews, but if developers are not willing to seriously consider the possibility that Gutenberg may not ultimately do more good than harm (considering the reviews are predominantly negative) then that is a clear sign of bias and senselessness. I formally request the Gutenberg team include in their formal project path a review at some point, that fairly voices the option of reverting. Publicly demonstrate that some kind of formal assessment process will be done to measure its success. That’s just good methodology. And for a change of this magnitude, simply required.
This needs to be scientifically tested, not subjectively jabbed at. So far, the only attempt at such science was a survey done a year ago which said people were more than satisfied with the existing editor…You guys have a duty to publically present some supportive data.
Included in that testing must be some kind of comparison against alternative ways of achieving similar functionality, such as some plugins.
I charge that if this kind of research is not done and publically presented, then the Gutenberg team is simply being unscientific.
Many are praising Gutenberg. Many are condemning it. That being the case, the guiding light should be the following two words:
“Prove it.”
- The topic ‘Concerns over Classic Editor Long-Term’ is closed to new replies.