Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Do the authors have a response to this claim?

    Doug M

    (@nes-native-english-services)

    It’s not a matter of a ‘claim’…it’s in the TOS.

    ———–
    It turns out that this is not a hacked site. It is content that is injected by a plugin called 404 to 301 plugin which has 70,000 active installs and has a 4.5 star review from 56 reviewers. When you install the plugin it asks you to agree to a long agreement which includes parts of the GNU general public license. But at the end it also includes the following text (you have to scroll down to find it):

    Third Party Text Links

    Third party text networks supply text for display in 404 to 301. These networks may collect your visitors’ IP addresses, in native or hashed forms, for purposes of controlling the distribution of text links. 404 to 301 collects anonymous aggregated usage statistics.

    By clicking the button here below, you agree to the terms and conditions and give permission to place text links on your website when search engine crawlers access it. Your website’s layout, performance and interaction with human visitors should not be altered or affected in any way. Please note that this feature can be deactivated at any time under 404 to 301 Setting > Help & Info > Plugin Information > Disable UAN, without affecting any other feature available in 404 to 301.

    Plugin Author Joel James

    (@joelcj91)

    Hi all,

    I confirm this code injection issue and removed the entire script related to tracking feature. It was being handled by one of my partner developer who made this changes in tracking.

    I rectified that it was not a hacking attempt but was inserting links after you accept the TOC. I will make sure to check each lines of code before committing to wp.org in feature.

    Please update the plugin to latest version, if you still believe in my work. I am sorry for the confusions and lack of responsibility.

    PS: I am copy pasting this comments everywhere since there are 100s of people posting about the same issue.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Cloaking.. SERIOUSLY??’ is closed to new replies.