Choose image order

No, so far there is no way to change the order of the images for the lightbox.

I can think about adding something to deal with this in future version – however I would not use a custom attribute. The tab order of your images will also not be in the order they are displayed – so you should take care of this as well by using tabindex.

Also see here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Global_attributes/tabindex

I can add support for this attribute in future versions.

i cheked tabindex looks good for me , not a problem to add it in the or even in the .if its not to much assle to add the support for this i will be very happy if you do so.
thanks in advance

Just make sure, you use tabindex in the links and not the images:

<a href="some-image.jpg" tabindex="1">
   <img src="some-image-300x300.jpg" />
</a>

<a href="another-image.jpg" tabindex="2">
   <img src="another-image-300x300.jpg" />
</a>

well its the most easy case for me ??
i will do the coding now so it will be ready for the update.
thanks a lot for all this ??

Version 3.0.7 adds support for tabindex.

hello
just tested it , so after first test , the behavior is not good , or i have to put number diferent way…
it do 1 – 10 – 11 – 12 …
i will try to start number with 0
01 02 03 04…

so it did the trick , need to have number with 0 and it work like charm for me ??

thanks a lot

Thanks for the feedback. I was about to tell you that the tabindex must be number as shown in the example – just start with 0 or 1 and then count upwards.

Working example for reference:

https://wordpress-demo.arnowelzel.de/images-with-tabindex/

Ok, I undestand the problem – the sort function of JavaScript does not sort numerical but as text ??

So it will be 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 20, 21 and so on. Of course this makes no sense. I’ll change that.

for now on my side its fine as i put 0 … so you can fix just next update ??
and yes i guess the variable is use as text and not as number

Version 3.0.8 contains a fix to sort tabindex values numerical.

So you should now also be fine with values above 10 since the numerical sort order is now as expected: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and not 1, 10, 11, 2, 3 …

great , tested , and works good ??

best support ever, thanks a lot