I’ve been looking and see some things that could help, but am wondering if anyone has a good suggestion for such a product database within a WordPress site, especially a solution that will allow me to have my users enter their data next year via a form (this year I will just need to import my data from the spreadsheet/csv). Thanks.

Just downloaded the Jetpack CRM plugin to test on a local development site. I have added a custom field in the Company Custom Fields options but when I try to search for entries in my dummy companies inside the “Companies” – “View All” section, it doesn’t give me any results. It just ask if I want to add a new company because it couldn’t find any results.

I need to have a searchable field called “Company Number” if I’m to be able to use Jetpack CRM on a live site. This I have done above, but the custom field doesn’t seem to be searchable. Is it not possible to have any custom filed searchable, or is it only possible for the fields that comes with the plugin?

I use this snippet to display the book author below the summary of single product and it is working fine.

add_action( 'woocommerce_single_product_summary', 'show_info_below_single_product_summary', 20 );
function show_info_below_single_product_summary() {
     the_terms( $post->ID, 'book_author', __("<div class='book_author'>Book Author:","storefront-child") , ', ', '</div>' ); 
     echo $post->ID;
}

My problem is that I am getting zero results when I am searching for a book author.

Is there any way to make this taxonomy searchable?

Thanks

WordPress version: 5.8.1
Custom Post Type UI: 1.10.0
WooCommerce: 5.8.0
Theme: Storefront 3.9.1

And is there a way to rebuild the index?

On my example page to demonstrate this, I have made the Status column not searchable using "columnDefs": [ { "searchable": false, "targets": [ 4 ] } ] The similar column IUCN is searchable. The dropdown column filter on Status does not work, but IUCN does.

The problem with it being searchable comes from the actual search field. If I search for the string ‘lc’ for example, it is actually found many times in the IUCN column and therefore confuses the results.

Logically column filters should not need to be searchable: it is a valid use case to be able to use a dropdown filter but not a text search on the same column.

Am I missing something here?