• <!– wp:paragraph –>
    <p class=””>The Hummingbird comes with a feature that can either be its best or worst aspect, depending on your website’s build. I’ve found it to work quite successfully on a number of tiny minisites, but the experience differs when dealing with larger sites built on Elementor.</p>
    <!– /wp:paragraph –>

    <!– wp:paragraph –>
    <p class=””>For small minisites, it works just great. However, on larger Elementor-based sites, it tends to be less reliable. One major issue is that it frequently turns off caching due to the asset optimization detecting changes. This renders the caching feature completely useless, as it fails to generate cache on many pages, leading to a decrease in performance.</p>
    <!– /wp:paragraph –>

    <!– wp:paragraph –>
    <p class=””>On the other hand, the ability to customize the optimization settings for each detected file is a standout feature that can be used on it’s own with combination with other plugin. It proves particularly useful in certain circumstances, allowing you to fine-tune your website’s performance by adjusting individual CSS and JS files.</p>
    <!– /wp:paragraph –>

    <!– wp:paragraph –>
    <p class=””>In terms of other optimization options, Hummingbird offers fairly standard choices. What sets it apart is the elegant interface though sometimes it might be difficult to find some options in its numerous submenus.</p>
    <!– /wp:paragraph –>

    <!– wp:paragraph –>
    <p class=””>In conclusion, the Hummingbird WordPress Optimization Plugin can be a valuable asset for smaller websites, but its effectiveness diminishes on larger sites, especially those built with Elementor. The customization options for individual assets are a strong point, while the overall user interface enhances the user experience.</p>
    <!– /wp:paragraph –>

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • The topic ‘Good on smaller sites or as a standalone CSS optimiser’ is closed to new replies.