Feature request: highlighting “Note”
-
Hi there
I’d like to ask for a feature, which Jan a while ago, upon request availed an option to include if one wanted. It may still be there, though and I’m just failing to find it.
In the ingredient field, you have under “Note” an example of “extra virgin”, to (olive) oil, I suppose.
There are situations in which the “note” may be a different type, like you have “beef”, but you want to add “pork” or “mutton”, etc, etc as an option instead. In such cases, one has the ingredient: beef which would be linked, but if you would like to include mutton and make clear it’s an option, you have to put it in the same field as “beef” like I do in the linked example, but awkwardly the “ingredient” is “beef(or mutton)”.In my specific example, I also wanted to include a note, whatever meat is used, should be “pre-cooked”. OK, in this case, too many notes.
I would suggest, assuming I wanted to add to add “mutton” OR “pre-cooked” as a “Note” for beef, that the “Note” have the option, by default to be highlighted, like with brackets, [something Jan provided a while back], so that … I can have under ingredients:
beef (pre-cooked) OR beef (or mutton) instead of beef pre-cooked OR beef (or mutton) BUT with only one of the meat ingredients linked as an ingredient.
or
olive oil (extra virgin) … instead of just olive oil extra virgin.I would think the brackets help to separate the Note from the ingredient, especially if the “Note” is a different type than just the type of olive oil.
The brackets for the “Note” in my recipe were added manually, but it’d be good if by default, they appear whenever one adds a “Note”.
I hope it makes sense.
Some feedback would very much be appreciated.
Many thanks for the great plugin.
-
This topic was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
This topic was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by
-
This topic was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by
The page I need help with: [log in to see the link]
-
This topic was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by
-
Another probably small observation on my Xampp-based test site:
My recipe archive page has always been site.com/recipe => https://www.habarisearch.com/recipe/, I assume “recipe” being taken from the slug. I know “recipes” would make more sense, … but I do not remember how I used “recipe” instead, possibly because it was suggested in the original plugin settings.
So when I updated to current dev. version, I noted “https://localhost/habarisearch.com/recipe“, which was inherited in navigation menu leads to a 404 not found error, although in the plugin settings, “slug” = “recipe“, below which is the descriptive text => “Recipe archives will be accessible at https://localhost/habarisearch.com/slug/lemon-cheese-cake”. I thought it should inherit /recipes/ from the archives url, … ?
The correct archive page is at =>
https://localhost/habarisearch.com/recipes, although strangely, when you click on individual listed recipe links, like https://localhost/habarisearch.com/recipe/half-cake-mandazi-recipe/, as you see, there we have “recipe”. With current, production version: https://www.habarisearch.com/recipe/half-cake-mandazi-recipe/Is there some contradiction, or it’s correct, that way?
Regards
- The topic ‘Feature request: highlighting “Note”’ is closed to new replies.
